From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=ku3G=DQ=vger.kernel.org=git-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A7FC433E7
	for <git@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 18:18:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EE222284
	for <git@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 18:18:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S2388014AbgJISSx (ORCPT <rfc822;git@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 9 Oct 2020 14:18:53 -0400
Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:55452 "EHLO cloud.peff.net"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1731198AbgJISSw (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 9 Oct 2020 14:18:52 -0400
Received: (qmail 9349 invoked by uid 109); 9 Oct 2020 18:18:52 -0000
Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2)
 by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 18:18:52 +0000
Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none
Received: (qmail 4806 invoked by uid 111); 9 Oct 2020 18:18:51 -0000
Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2)
 by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 14:18:51 -0400
Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none
Date:   Fri, 9 Oct 2020 14:18:27 -0400
From:   Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To:     Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc:     Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
        Chris Webster <chris@webstech.net>,
        "Chris. Webster via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
        git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci: github action - add check for whitespace errors
Message-ID: <20201009181827.GA965760@coredump.intra.peff.net>
References: <pull.709.git.1600759684548.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
 <20200922170745.GA541915@coredump.intra.peff.net>
 <xmqq1ritlmrk.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
 <CAGT1KpU4Kjv2PEAA7-bNbGp2DFvfsKqABuUK68128xkLjdcEhA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGT1KpXz4nFBu2xkVSaoW4DgXc_5oB69MQRQW=365gfgd_R-mQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2010091519460.50@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
 <xmqqtuv3tlkv.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
 <20201009175917.GA963340@coredump.intra.peff.net>
 <xmqqeem7tgh4.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <xmqqeem7tgh4.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 11:13:43AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > As the other person in the discussion, I'm sufficiently convinced that
> > doing this just for PRs is a good step for now. I.e., I think the
> > "completed form" is just what was posted already (though I agree it is
> > often convenient to the maintainer to re-post the patch as part of the
> > ping).
> 
> Yes, and CC'ing those who were involved in the review would give
> them the last chance to say "oh, no, that extra change you added
> for this final submission was not something I meant to suggest!",
> etc.
> 
> So, is <pull.709.git.1600759684548.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> as-is the
> one we should take?

AFAIK it's the only one on the list. :) So yes, that one is fine with
me.

-Peff