From: Seth House <seth@eseth.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>,
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re* [PATCH v2] fixup! mergetool: add automerge configuration
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 21:24:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210116042454.GA4913@ellen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqh7np9gqn.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 03:24:48AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Note that with t7800 fixed with the patch, non Windows jobs all seem
> to pass, but t7610 seems to have problem(s) on Windows.
The autocrlf test is breaking because the sed that ships with some mingw
versions (and also some minsys and cygwin versions) will *automatically*
remove carriage returns:
$ printf 'foo\r\nbar\r\n' | sed -e '/bar/d' | cat -A
foo$
$ printf 'foo\r\nbar\r\n' | sed -b -e '/bar/d' | cat -A
foo^M$
(Note: the -b flag above is just for comparison. We can't use it here.
It's not in POSIX and is not present in sed for busybox or OSX.)
I haven't found official docs that describe this behavior yet but
I found a few discussions about it across a few lists. E.g.:
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2017-June/233121.html
Suggestions welcome.
Obviously we could try to detect crlf's before the sed and then try to
re-add them back in after sed but that strikes me as error-prone.
I recall someone mentioning calling merge-file twice, once with --ours
and once with --theirs, to independently generate each "side" of the
conflict instead of using sed to split MERGED. Is that a viable
approach?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-16 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-09 21:49 [PATCH] fixup! mergetool: add automerge configuration David Aguilar
2021-01-09 21:59 ` brian m. carlson
2021-01-09 22:42 ` [PATCH v2] " David Aguilar
2021-01-09 22:54 ` Seth House
2021-01-10 1:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-10 6:40 ` Re* " Junio C Hamano
2021-01-10 7:29 ` Seth House
2021-01-10 11:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-16 4:24 ` Seth House [this message]
2021-01-20 23:24 ` automerge implementation ideas for Windows Seth House
2021-01-21 22:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-22 1:09 ` Seth House
2021-01-22 2:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-22 2:50 ` Re* [PATCH v2] fixup! mergetool: add automerge configuration brian m. carlson
2021-01-22 16:29 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-22 23:25 ` brian m. carlson
2021-01-26 14:32 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-26 18:06 ` Seth House
2021-01-26 20:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-27 3:37 ` Seth House
2021-01-29 0:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-09 23:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-10 1:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-09 23:21 ` [PATCH] " Junio C Hamano
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-22 9:08 Re* [PATCH v2] " Seth House
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210116042454.GA4913@ellen \
--to=seth@eseth.com \
--cc=davvid@gmail.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).