git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] MyFirstContribution: Document --range-diff option when writing v2
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 15:32:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210920223226.25877-1-chooglen@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210913194816.51182-1-chooglen@google.com>

In the "Sending v2" section, readers are directed to create v2 patches
without using --range-diff. However, it is customary to include a
range-diff against the v1 patches as a reviewer aid.

Update the "Sending v2" section to suggest a simple workflow that uses
the --range-diff option. Also include some explanation for -v2 and
--range-diff to help the reader understand the importance.

Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
---
Thanks for the helpful comments on v1! v2 aims to clear up other
ambiguities from v1 and to propose a specific workflow for readers.

Changes since v1:

* recommend that readers reuse the `psuh` topic branch for v2
* recommend that readers mark their v1 topic branch
* add a link to the range-diff docs
* change the v2 glob pattern to `psuh/v2-*.patch` to match the v1 example
* explicitly call out the v2 glob pattern so that readers will be extra
  careful

Interdiff against v1:
  diff --git a/Documentation/MyFirstContribution.txt b/Documentation/MyFirstContribution.txt
  index add1c2bba9..790bf1e8b5 100644
  --- a/Documentation/MyFirstContribution.txt
  +++ b/Documentation/MyFirstContribution.txt
  @@ -1029,27 +1029,29 @@ kidding - be patient!)
   [[v2-git-send-email]]
   === Sending v2
   
  -Skip ahead to <<reviewing,Responding to Reviews>> for information on how to
  -handle comments from reviewers. Continue this section when your topic branch is
  -shaped the way you want it to look for your patchset v2.
  +This section will focus on how to send a v2 of your patchset. To learn what
  +should go into v2, skip ahead to <<reviewing,Responding to Reviews>> for
  +information on how to handle comments from reviewers.
   
  -Let's write v2 as its own topic branch, because this will make some things more
  -convenient later on. Create the `psuh-v2` branch like so:
  +We'll reuse our `psuh` topic branch for v2. Before we make any changes, we'll
  +mark the tip of our v1 branch for easy reference:
   
   ----
  -$ git checkout -b psuh-v2 psuh
  +$ git checkout psuh
  +$ git branch psuh-v1
   ----
   
  -When you're ready with the next iteration of your patch, the process is fairly
  -similar to before. Generate your patches again, but with some new flags:
  +Make your changes with `git rebase -i`. Once you're ready with the next
  +iteration of your patch, the process is fairly similar to before. Generate your
  +patches again, but with some new flags:
   
   ----
  -$ git format-patch -v2 --range-diff psuh..psuh-v2 --cover-letter -o psuh/ master..psuh
  +$ git format-patch -v2 --cover-letter -o psuh/ --range-diff master..psuh-v1 master..
   ----
   
  -The `--range-diff psuh..psuh-v2` parameter tells `format-patch` to include a
  -range diff between `psuh` and `psuh-v2`. This helps tell reviewers about the
  -differences between your v1 and v2 patches.
  +The `--range-diff master..psuh-v1` parameter tells `format-patch` to include a
  +range-diff between `psuh-v1` and `psuh` (see linkgit:git-range-diff[1]). This
  +helps tell reviewers about the differences between your v1 and v2 patches.
   
   The `-v2` parameter tells `format-patch` to output "v2" patches. For instance,
   you may notice that your v2 patches, are all named like
  @@ -1058,8 +1060,10 @@ prefixing them with "[PATCH V2]" instead of "[PATCH]", and your range-diff will
   be prefaced with "Range-diff against v1".
   
   Afer you run this command, `format-patch` will output the patches to the `psuh/`
  -directory, alongside the v1 patches. That's fine, but be careful when you are
  -ready to send them.
  +directory, alongside the v1 patches. Using a single directory makes it easy to
  +refer to the old v1 patches while proofreading the v2 patches, but you will need
  +to be careful to send out only the v2 patches. We will use a pattern like
  +"psuh/v2-*.patch" ("psuh/*.patch" would match v1 and v2 patches).
   
   Edit your cover letter again. Now is a good time to mention what's different
   between your last version and now, if it's something significant. You do not
  @@ -1097,7 +1101,7 @@ to the command:
   ----
   $ git send-email --to=target@example.com
   		 --in-reply-to="<foo.12345.author@example.com>"
  -		 psuh/v2*
  +		 psuh/v2-*.patch
   ----
   
   [[single-patch]]

 Documentation/MyFirstContribution.txt | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/MyFirstContribution.txt b/Documentation/MyFirstContribution.txt
index 015cf24631..790bf1e8b5 100644
--- a/Documentation/MyFirstContribution.txt
+++ b/Documentation/MyFirstContribution.txt
@@ -1029,22 +1029,41 @@ kidding - be patient!)
 [[v2-git-send-email]]
 === Sending v2
 
-Skip ahead to <<reviewing,Responding to Reviews>> for information on how to
-handle comments from reviewers. Continue this section when your topic branch is
-shaped the way you want it to look for your patchset v2.
+This section will focus on how to send a v2 of your patchset. To learn what
+should go into v2, skip ahead to <<reviewing,Responding to Reviews>> for
+information on how to handle comments from reviewers.
+
+We'll reuse our `psuh` topic branch for v2. Before we make any changes, we'll
+mark the tip of our v1 branch for easy reference:
 
-When you're ready with the next iteration of your patch, the process is fairly
-similar.
+----
+$ git checkout psuh
+$ git branch psuh-v1
+----
 
-First, generate your v2 patches again:
+Make your changes with `git rebase -i`. Once you're ready with the next
+iteration of your patch, the process is fairly similar to before. Generate your
+patches again, but with some new flags:
 
 ----
-$ git format-patch -v2 --cover-letter -o psuh/ master..psuh
+$ git format-patch -v2 --cover-letter -o psuh/ --range-diff master..psuh-v1 master..
 ----
 
-This will add your v2 patches, all named like `v2-000n-my-commit-subject.patch`,
-to the `psuh/` directory. You may notice that they are sitting alongside the v1
-patches; that's fine, but be careful when you are ready to send them.
+The `--range-diff master..psuh-v1` parameter tells `format-patch` to include a
+range-diff between `psuh-v1` and `psuh` (see linkgit:git-range-diff[1]). This
+helps tell reviewers about the differences between your v1 and v2 patches.
+
+The `-v2` parameter tells `format-patch` to output "v2" patches. For instance,
+you may notice that your v2 patches, are all named like
+`v2-000n-my-commit-subject.patch`. `-v2` will also format your patches by
+prefixing them with "[PATCH V2]" instead of "[PATCH]", and your range-diff will
+be prefaced with "Range-diff against v1".
+
+Afer you run this command, `format-patch` will output the patches to the `psuh/`
+directory, alongside the v1 patches. Using a single directory makes it easy to
+refer to the old v1 patches while proofreading the v2 patches, but you will need
+to be careful to send out only the v2 patches. We will use a pattern like
+"psuh/v2-*.patch" ("psuh/*.patch" would match v1 and v2 patches).
 
 Edit your cover letter again. Now is a good time to mention what's different
 between your last version and now, if it's something significant. You do not
@@ -1082,7 +1101,7 @@ to the command:
 ----
 $ git send-email --to=target@example.com
 		 --in-reply-to="<foo.12345.author@example.com>"
-		 psuh/v2*
+		 psuh/v2-*.patch
 ----
 
 [[single-patch]]
-- 
2.33.0.464.g1972c5931b-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-21  2:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-13 19:48 [PATCH] MyFirstContribution: Document --range-diff option when writing v2 Glen Choo
2021-09-13 20:00 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-09-13 20:05   ` Eric Sunshine
2021-09-13 21:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-14 17:21   ` Glen Choo
2021-09-14 21:39     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-14  2:43 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2021-09-14  3:46   ` Eric Sunshine
2021-09-14  3:55     ` Bagas Sanjaya
2021-09-20 22:32 ` Glen Choo [this message]
2021-09-21  4:59   ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Sunshine
2021-09-21 17:31     ` Glen Choo
2021-09-21 17:33     ` Glen Choo
2021-09-21 17:34     ` Glen Choo
2021-09-21  5:33   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2021-09-21 17:58     ` Glen Choo
2021-09-22 18:54     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-22 12:18   ` Philip Oakley
2021-09-22 17:34     ` Glen Choo
2021-09-23 13:44       ` Philip Oakley
2021-09-23  5:46     ` Bagas Sanjaya
2021-09-22 20:22   ` [PATCH v3] " Glen Choo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210920223226.25877-1-chooglen@google.com \
    --to=chooglen@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).