From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] fetch: pass --no-write-fetch-head to subprocesses
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 22:22:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230308222205.M679514@dcvr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqwn3rta2c.fsf@gitster.g>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> writes:
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] fetch: pass --no-write-fetch-head to subprocesses
>
> I read the title as saying that "git fetch --recurse-submodules
> --no-write-fetch-head" should propagate the latter option down to
> fetches done in submodules, but looking at the added test, you are
> addressing a different use case, aren't you? Or are you covering
> both "fetch: honor --no-write-fetch-head when fetching from multiple
> remotes" and "fetch: pass --no-write-fetch-head down to submodules"?
Just multiple remotes, I hardly deal with submodules.
> > It seems a user would expect this option would work regardless
> > of whether it's fetching from a single remote or many.
>
> This hints that it is only the latter, but if we are covering both
>
> (1) the title we have here may be alright.
Yes, I figured so. I actually considered just using the title
and didn't really feel the need to add a message body
> (2) the proposed log message should state the change affects both
> (in a good way).
Updated.
> (3) the other half may want to be tested in new test as well.
OK, updated t5526, hope it's portable. I mimicked the
formatting style of each respective test so the diff itself
looks odd between changes to t5514 and t5526 :x
> Thanks.
v2: revised commit message body, test submodules in t5526
---8<---
Subject: [PATCH] fetch: pass --no-write-fetch-head to subprocesses
It seems a user would expect this option would work regardless
of whether it's fetching from a single remote, many remotes,
or recursing into submodules.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
---
builtin/fetch.c | 2 ++
t/t5514-fetch-multiple.sh | 7 +++++++
t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh | 13 +++++++++++++
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/builtin/fetch.c b/builtin/fetch.c
index a09606b472..78513f1708 100644
--- a/builtin/fetch.c
+++ b/builtin/fetch.c
@@ -1880,6 +1880,8 @@ static void add_options_to_argv(struct strvec *argv)
strvec_push(argv, "--ipv4");
else if (family == TRANSPORT_FAMILY_IPV6)
strvec_push(argv, "--ipv6");
+ if (!write_fetch_head)
+ strvec_push(argv, "--no-write-fetch-head");
}
/* Fetch multiple remotes in parallel */
diff --git a/t/t5514-fetch-multiple.sh b/t/t5514-fetch-multiple.sh
index 54f422ced3..98f034aa77 100755
--- a/t/t5514-fetch-multiple.sh
+++ b/t/t5514-fetch-multiple.sh
@@ -58,6 +58,13 @@ test_expect_success 'git fetch --all' '
test_cmp expect output)
'
+test_expect_success 'git fetch --all --no-write-fetch-head' '
+ (cd test &&
+ rm -f .git/FETCH_HEAD &&
+ git fetch --all --no-write-fetch-head &&
+ test_path_is_missing .git/FETCH_HEAD)
+'
+
test_expect_success 'git fetch --all should continue if a remote has errors' '
(git clone one test2 &&
cd test2 &&
diff --git a/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh b/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh
index b9546ef8e5..8ffb300f2d 100755
--- a/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh
+++ b/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh
@@ -167,6 +167,19 @@ test_expect_success "fetch --recurse-submodules recurses into submodules" '
verify_fetch_result actual.err
'
+test_expect_success "fetch --recurse-submodules honors --no-write-fetch-head" '
+ (
+ cd downstream &&
+ fh=$(find . -name FETCH_HEAD -type f) &&
+ rm -f $fh &&
+ git fetch --recurse-submodules --no-write-fetch-head &&
+ for f in $fh
+ do
+ test_path_is_missing $f || return 1
+ done
+ )
+'
+
test_expect_success "submodule.recurse option triggers recursive fetch" '
add_submodule_commits &&
(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-08 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-08 10:04 [PATCH] fetch: pass --no-write-fetch-head to subprocesses Eric Wong
2023-03-08 17:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-08 22:22 ` Eric Wong [this message]
2023-03-08 23:13 ` [PATCH v2] " Junio C Hamano
2023-03-08 23:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-08 23:48 ` Eric Wong
2023-03-09 21:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-09 3:09 ` [PATCH] " Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230308222205.M679514@dcvr \
--to=e@80x24.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).