From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] replacing ci/config/allow-ref with a repo variable
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 20:44:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230914004406.GA2224848@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230914003010.GA1709842@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Two minor corrections in what I wrote...
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 08:30:10PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> (BTW, one other thing I tried was using fromJSON(vars.CI_CONFIG) in the
> "on" expression, which in theory would allow globbing. But it doesn't
> look like expressions work at all in that context. And even if they did,
> I'm not sure we could make it work such that an empty CI_CONFIG used
> some defaults, since there's no conditional-expression ternary
> operator).
It's not a real ?: operator, but GitHub does use the word "ternary" to
describe the short-circuit behavior of:
condition && "if-true" || "if-not-true"
So in theory we could do:
on: ${{ fromJSON(var.CI_ON != '' && vars.CI_ON || "[pull_request, push]" }}
but I couldn't make it work (it complains about the value of "on" in
such a way that I assume it is simply not expanding expressions at all).
> We have the necessary bits at the protocol: push-options. But it's up to
> the server-side hooks to decide which ones are meaningful and to do
> something useful with them. It looks like GitLab supports:
>
> git push -o ci.skip=1 ...
>
> but I don't think GitHub respects any equivalent option.
The syntax here is actually just "git push -o ci.skip", without the
equals.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-14 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-30 19:49 [PATCH 0/2] replacing ci/config/allow-ref with a repo variable Jeff King
2023-08-30 19:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] ci: allow branch selection through "vars" Jeff King
2023-09-03 8:59 ` Johannes Schindelin
2023-09-05 7:30 ` Jeff King
2023-09-05 10:51 ` Johannes Schindelin
2023-09-07 7:47 ` Jeff King
2023-08-30 19:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] ci: deprecate ci/config/allow-ref script Jeff King
2023-08-30 22:55 ` [PATCH 0/2] replacing ci/config/allow-ref with a repo variable Junio C Hamano
2023-09-01 13:24 ` Phillip Wood
2023-09-01 17:32 ` Jeff King
2023-09-04 9:56 ` Phillip Wood
2023-09-05 7:24 ` Jeff King
2023-09-07 10:04 ` Phillip Wood
2023-09-11 9:36 ` Jeff King
2023-09-13 15:16 ` Phillip Wood
2023-09-14 0:30 ` Jeff King
2023-09-14 0:44 ` Jeff King [this message]
2023-09-14 10:49 ` Phillip Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230914004406.GA2224848@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).