From: Michael Lohmann <mi.al.lohmann@gmail.com>
To: phillip.wood123@gmail.com
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, mi.al.lohmann@gmail.com,
phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk, wanja.hentze@bevuta.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] builtin/revert.c: refactor using an enum for cmd-action
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 18:47:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240111174727.55189-1-mi.al.lohmann@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ed0e249-dab9-4cf3-9b76-c8797b97c9c5@gmail.com>
This is done to avoid having to keep the char values in sync in
different places and also to get compiler warnings on non-exhaustive
switches.
In the rebase `action` enum there is the enumeration constant
`ACTION_NONE` which is not particularly descriptive, since it seems to
imply that no action should be taken. Instead it signals a start of a
revert/cherry-pick process, so here `ACTION_START` was chosen.
Co-authored-by: Wanja Henze <wanja.hentze@bevuta.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Lohmann <mi.al.lohmann@gmail.com>
---
Hi Phillip!
Thanks for the feedback!
On 11/01/2024 16:57, Phillip Wood wrote:
> I can see the attraction of using an exhaustive switch() here but as
> we don't want to do anything in the _START case it gets a bit messy
> with the extra conditional below. I wonder if we'd be better to
> replace "if (cmd) {" with "if (cmd != REVERT_ACTION_START) {".
> Alternatively if you want to stick with the switch then declaring
> "this_operation" at the beginning of the function would mean you can
> get rid of the new "{}" block.
> The extra indentation here is unfortunate as some of the lines are
> rather long already. In the current code it is clear that we only call
> verify_opt_compatible() when cmd is non-nul, I think it would be
> clearer to use "if (cmd != REVERT_ACTION_START)" here.
Totally agreed - an alternative to the `if` would be a `goto` (see this
version of the patch). This would keep the benefit of the exhaustive
switch, but I don't know if that would fit the style used in this
project... (at least it is a jump forward...)
Changes compared to the previous patch:
- initialize `this_operation` pointer with NULL instead of 0
- drop "REVERT_" prefix of enum and its members
- declare `this_operation` at the toplevel to get rid of codeblock
- skip the verify_opt_compatible in case of ACTION_START with a `goto`
Best wishes
Michael
builtin/revert.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/revert.c b/builtin/revert.c
index 89821bab95..19e6653f99 100644
--- a/builtin/revert.c
+++ b/builtin/revert.c
@@ -20,6 +20,14 @@
* Copyright (c) 2005 Junio C Hamano
*/
+enum action {
+ ACTION_START = 0,
+ ACTION_CONTINUE,
+ ACTION_SKIP,
+ ACTION_ABORT,
+ ACTION_QUIT,
+};
+
static const char * const revert_usage[] = {
N_("git revert [--[no-]edit] [-n] [-m <parent-number>] [-s] [-S[<keyid>]] <commit>..."),
N_("git revert (--continue | --skip | --abort | --quit)"),
@@ -85,12 +93,13 @@ static int run_sequencer(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,
const char * const * usage_str = revert_or_cherry_pick_usage(opts);
const char *me = action_name(opts);
const char *cleanup_arg = NULL;
- int cmd = 0;
+ char *this_operation = NULL;
+ enum action cmd = ACTION_START;
struct option base_options[] = {
- OPT_CMDMODE(0, "quit", &cmd, N_("end revert or cherry-pick sequence"), 'q'),
- OPT_CMDMODE(0, "continue", &cmd, N_("resume revert or cherry-pick sequence"), 'c'),
- OPT_CMDMODE(0, "abort", &cmd, N_("cancel revert or cherry-pick sequence"), 'a'),
- OPT_CMDMODE(0, "skip", &cmd, N_("skip current commit and continue"), 's'),
+ OPT_CMDMODE(0, "quit", &cmd, N_("end revert or cherry-pick sequence"), ACTION_QUIT),
+ OPT_CMDMODE(0, "continue", &cmd, N_("resume revert or cherry-pick sequence"), ACTION_CONTINUE),
+ OPT_CMDMODE(0, "abort", &cmd, N_("cancel revert or cherry-pick sequence"), ACTION_ABORT),
+ OPT_CMDMODE(0, "skip", &cmd, N_("skip current commit and continue"), ACTION_SKIP),
OPT_CLEANUP(&cleanup_arg),
OPT_BOOL('n', "no-commit", &opts->no_commit, N_("don't automatically commit")),
OPT_BOOL('e', "edit", &opts->edit, N_("edit the commit message")),
@@ -144,32 +153,36 @@ static int run_sequencer(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,
}
/* Check for incompatible command line arguments */
- if (cmd) {
- char *this_operation;
- if (cmd == 'q')
- this_operation = "--quit";
- else if (cmd == 'c')
- this_operation = "--continue";
- else if (cmd == 's')
- this_operation = "--skip";
- else {
- assert(cmd == 'a');
- this_operation = "--abort";
- }
-
- verify_opt_compatible(me, this_operation,
- "--no-commit", opts->no_commit,
- "--signoff", opts->signoff,
- "--mainline", opts->mainline,
- "--strategy", opts->strategy ? 1 : 0,
- "--strategy-option", opts->xopts.nr ? 1 : 0,
- "-x", opts->record_origin,
- "--ff", opts->allow_ff,
- "--rerere-autoupdate", opts->allow_rerere_auto == RERERE_AUTOUPDATE,
- "--no-rerere-autoupdate", opts->allow_rerere_auto == RERERE_NOAUTOUPDATE,
- NULL);
+ switch (cmd) {
+ case ACTION_START:
+ goto skip_opt_compatibility_verification;
+ case ACTION_QUIT:
+ this_operation = "--quit";
+ break;
+ case ACTION_CONTINUE:
+ this_operation = "--continue";
+ break;
+ case ACTION_SKIP:
+ this_operation = "--skip";
+ break;
+ case ACTION_ABORT:
+ this_operation = "--abort";
+ break;
}
+ verify_opt_compatible(me, this_operation,
+ "--no-commit", opts->no_commit,
+ "--signoff", opts->signoff,
+ "--mainline", opts->mainline,
+ "--strategy", opts->strategy ? 1 : 0,
+ "--strategy-option", opts->xopts.nr ? 1 : 0,
+ "-x", opts->record_origin,
+ "--ff", opts->allow_ff,
+ "--rerere-autoupdate", opts->allow_rerere_auto == RERERE_AUTOUPDATE,
+ "--no-rerere-autoupdate", opts->allow_rerere_auto == RERERE_NOAUTOUPDATE,
+ NULL);
+
+skip_opt_compatibility_verification:
if (!opts->strategy && opts->default_strategy) {
opts->strategy = opts->default_strategy;
opts->default_strategy = NULL;
@@ -183,9 +196,7 @@ static int run_sequencer(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,
"--edit", opts->edit > 0,
NULL);
- if (cmd) {
- opts->revs = NULL;
- } else {
+ if (cmd == ACTION_START) {
struct setup_revision_opt s_r_opt;
opts->revs = xmalloc(sizeof(*opts->revs));
repo_init_revisions(the_repository, opts->revs, NULL);
@@ -198,6 +209,8 @@ static int run_sequencer(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,
memset(&s_r_opt, 0, sizeof(s_r_opt));
s_r_opt.assume_dashdash = 1;
argc = setup_revisions(argc, argv, opts->revs, &s_r_opt);
+ } else {
+ opts->revs = NULL;
}
if (argc > 1)
@@ -210,19 +223,22 @@ static int run_sequencer(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,
opts->strategy = xstrdup(getenv("GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM"));
free(options);
- if (cmd == 'q') {
+ switch (cmd) {
+ case ACTION_QUIT: {
int ret = sequencer_remove_state(opts);
if (!ret)
remove_branch_state(the_repository, 0);
return ret;
}
- if (cmd == 'c')
+ case ACTION_CONTINUE:
return sequencer_continue(the_repository, opts);
- if (cmd == 'a')
+ case ACTION_ABORT:
return sequencer_rollback(the_repository, opts);
- if (cmd == 's')
+ case ACTION_SKIP:
return sequencer_skip(the_repository, opts);
- return sequencer_pick_revisions(the_repository, opts);
+ case ACTION_START:
+ return sequencer_pick_revisions(the_repository, opts);
+ }
}
int cmd_revert(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
--
2.39.3 (Apple Git-145)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-11 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-11 8:04 [PATCH] builtin/revert.c: refactor using an enum for cmd-action Michael Lohmann
2024-01-11 16:57 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-11 17:47 ` Michael Lohmann [this message]
2024-01-11 19:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Junio C Hamano
2024-01-11 20:06 ` [PATCH v3] " Michael Lohmann
2024-01-11 21:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-12 0:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-12 7:24 ` Jeff King
2024-01-12 18:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-12 19:33 ` Michael Lohmann
2024-01-11 19:37 ` [PATCH] " Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240111174727.55189-1-mi.al.lohmann@gmail.com \
--to=mi.al.lohmann@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
--cc=wanja.hentze@bevuta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).