[PATCH 2/5] t-reftable-readwrite: use free_names() instead of a for loop

[Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@gmail.com>]

free_names() as defined by reftable/basics.{c,h} frees a NULL
terminated array of malloced strings along with the array itself.
Use this function instead of a for loop to free such an array.

Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@gmail.com>
---
 t/unit-tests/t-reftable-readwrite.c | 9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-readwrite.c b/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-readwrite.c
index 235e3d94c7..e90f2bf9de 100644
--- a/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-readwrite.c
+++ b/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-readwrite.c
@@ -413,7 +413,6 @@ static void t_table_read_api(void)
 	struct reftable_reader rd = { 0 };
 	struct reftable_block_source source = { 0 };
 	int err;
-	int i;
 	struct reftable_log_record log = { 0 };
 	struct reftable_iterator it = { 0 };
 
@@ -432,10 +431,8 @@ static void t_table_read_api(void)
 	check_int(err, ==, REFTABLE_API_ERROR);
 
 	strbuf_release(&buf);
-	for (i = 0; i < N; i++)
-		reftable_free(names[i]);
+	free_names(names);
 	reftable_iterator_destroy(&it);
-	reftable_free(names);
 	reader_close(&rd);
 	strbuf_release(&buf);
 }
@@ -498,9 +495,7 @@ static void t_table_read_write_seek(int index, int hash_id)
 	reftable_iterator_destroy(&it);
 
 	strbuf_release(&buf);
-	for (i = 0; i < N; i++)
-		reftable_free(names[i]);
-	reftable_free(names);
+	free_names(names);
 	reader_close(&rd);
 }
 
-- 
2.45.GIT