From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cloud.peff.net (cloud.peff.net [104.130.231.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2D2715B11D for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:12:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=104.130.231.41 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724058765; cv=none; b=eOcSpF5Be97lxoe/rVJBVDoSVyeqvUvaoQ4M9qe9VfEiztiHZ+cGnTRAQLvwVZkLMX9WBQJEZRtgjkq2R6QHLaXTu5d9WIp/Cpa4cdM6JMtbg1tlXmBwbT9aOqzRpkOLubAZuQgqqVlsrqvn88+hIotOS5LenZwElxkhBJRXwy0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724058765; c=relaxed/simple; bh=C2WW/54Qq7xx0k4NLrDevIHRdnlFtWFmxBnaw+aRAlA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uBMuC2ey21VqoACwDNJx89DOGQdV9l8bvUIjqkgMlfPb5K2fLMywZr6qmjk0Y4UlH+KGfNkKG03OhS+N/RWzaVvaagOWpCJgXx15Od7ONuJp981LxsfwKIpwUjl9WAUs5UCmgBReCSHLATT1Nsh6YPcPaRb6JsPH6D0EAQCAl8c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=peff.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=peff.net; arc=none smtp.client-ip=104.130.231.41 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=peff.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=peff.net Received: (qmail 8831 invoked by uid 109); 19 Aug 2024 09:12:42 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:12:42 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 18178 invoked by uid 111); 19 Aug 2024 09:12:46 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 05:12:46 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 05:12:41 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Wood , phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk, James Liu , Derrick Stolee , Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] t7900: fix flaky test due to leaking background job Message-ID: <20240819091241.GA2958552@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <4805bb6f6c2c96a2c40d1d8359b63b8c7045e0b6.1724053639.git.ps@pks.im> <20240819084943.GB2955268@coredump.intra.peff.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 10:55:07AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > > This looks correct, but should we be doing it for all of the "git > > maintenance" runs in that script? They're all going to kick off detached > > gc jobs, I think. > > Only those that use `--detach` run in the background. I thought since the default for maintenance.autoDetach was true, all of the "--auto" ones would need something similar. I notice a lot of those use "--task", though, so maybe that doesn't count. I'm not clear on all of the rules. -Peff