From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cloud.peff.net (cloud.peff.net [104.130.231.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E6BE946C for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 11:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=104.130.231.41 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726398438; cv=none; b=df6bd3jUWSCRF0IqJWLS6O6unHywHt3Xboj4Duf1mtBqfZrkTpd8esg+3xhWoCxDWp0AsrpN3zC1eKwVLNSjTLvvW9ZHdtkp6f2yEPjE+aTp0K1/fkLxqUBVEPa0LQKG0IVK6r1jhqRRCxdkrYqB7rS/Z7OYatmy2G3kTs7/lws= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726398438; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dKu6OBEkX4YbrUJHrPuS8IoH5ODUuukqJaoY5nSDGzg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QcEGcQ6LdzSDxuoI95fU5AqscfLaDzfD+UpAb4a6O83Uf9DTwTTXdGMta24H7DElcFgHblxCaa/7xCAr3NveFfOhYVIdqb+Zr/2pqmUnAJsTpqDgbEvRKTi2HxWu6JSYIcarDa4hNcQQIQrjYhyqnc9Rb9coLEBXdq63qYUwKlE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=peff.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=peff.net; arc=none smtp.client-ip=104.130.231.41 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=peff.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=peff.net Received: (qmail 8041 invoked by uid 109); 15 Sep 2024 11:07:08 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 11:07:08 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 22002 invoked by uid 111); 15 Sep 2024 11:07:06 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 07:07:06 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 07:07:06 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci(linux32): make Javascript Actions work in x86 mode Message-ID: <20240915110706.GA2017642@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20240914072932.GB1284567@coredump.intra.peff.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 10:17:16AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Each of these approaches may have its pros and cons, but I somehow > do not see that the newly proposed alternative is 10x better than > what was reviewed and queued already to be worth the effort to > replace it. That's my feeling, too, but I'd reserve final judgement to see Dscho's response; it's possible I am under-estimating the 32/64-bit confusion risk. I'd also note that his patch does not require bumping the distro version, which would let us continue testing that old version in GitHub Actions. That might be worth considering. -Peff