git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lucas Seiki Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lucas Seiki Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: [GSoC][PATCH v3] merge-strategies.adoc: detail submodule merge
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:18:00 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250225161800.8268-1-lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com> (raw)

Submodule merges are, in general, similar to other merges based on oid
three-way-merge. When a conflict happens, however, Git has two special
cases (introduced in 68d03e4a6e44) on handling the conflict before
yielding it to the user. From the merge-ort and merge-recursive sources:

- "Case #1: a is contained in b or vice versa": both strategies try to
perform a fast-forward in the submodules if the commit referred by the
conflicted submodule is descendant of another;

- "Case #2: There are one or more merges that contain a and b in the
submodule.  If there is only one, then present it as a suggestion to the
user, but leave it marked unmerged so the user needs to confirm the
resolution."

Add a small paragraph on merge-strategies.adoc describing this behavior.

Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Seiki Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com>
---

This v3 keeps the same content as the previous v2. However, it uses the
proper way to declare paragraphs inside explanations and replaces the
duplicated paragraph in `recursive` strategy by a small paragraph
telling that it behaves the same way as `ort` when merging submodules.

 Documentation/merge-strategies.adoc | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/merge-strategies.adoc b/Documentation/merge-strategies.adoc
index 5fc54ec060..9c30f1c900 100644
--- a/Documentation/merge-strategies.adoc
+++ b/Documentation/merge-strategies.adoc
@@ -22,6 +22,13 @@ ort::
 	was written as a replacement for the previous default
 	algorithm, `recursive`.
 +
+In the case where the path is a submodule, if the submodule commit used on
+one side of the merge is a descendant of the submodule commit used on the
+other side of the merge, Git attempts to fast-forward to the
+descendant. Otherwise, Git will treat this case as a conflict, suggesting
+as a resolution a submodule commit that is descendant of the conflicting
+ones, if one exists.
++
 The 'ort' strategy can take the following options:
 
 ours;;
@@ -95,6 +102,10 @@ recursive::
 	renames.  It does not make use of detected copies.  This was
 	the default strategy for resolving two heads from Git v0.99.9k
 	until v2.33.0.
+
++
+For a path that is a submodule, the same caution as 'ort' applies to this
+strategy.
 +
 The 'recursive' strategy takes the same options as 'ort'.  However,
 there are three additional options that 'ort' ignores (not documented
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


             reply	other threads:[~2025-02-25 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-25 16:18 Lucas Seiki Oshiro [this message]
2025-02-25 18:18 ` [GSoC][PATCH v3] merge-strategies.adoc: detail submodule merge Junio C Hamano
2025-02-26 22:09   ` Lucas Seiki Oshiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250225161800.8268-1-lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com \
    --to=lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).