git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>, Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>,
	Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
	Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
	Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] promisor-remote: refactor to get rid of 'struct strvec'
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:52:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250429145243.992252-2-christian.couder@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250429145243.992252-1-christian.couder@gmail.com>

In a following commit, we will use the new 'promisor-remote' protocol
capability introduced by d460267613 (Add 'promisor-remote' capability
to protocol v2, 2025-02-18) to pass and process more information
about promisor remotes than just their name and url.

For that purpose, we will need to store information about other
fields, especially information that might or might not be available
for different promisor remotes. Unfortunately using 'struct strvec',
as we currently do, to store information about the promisor remotes
with one 'struct strvec' for each field like "name" or "url" does not
scale easily in that case.

Let's refactor this and introduce a new 'struct promisor_info' linked
list that contains a 'struct string_list fields'. This string_list
stores the field names, like "name" and "url", in the 'string' member
of its items, and the field values in the 'util' member of its items.

Except for "name", each "<field_name>/<field_value>" pair should
correspond to a "remote.<name>.<field_name>" config variable set to
<field_value> where "<name>" is a promisor remote name.

Previously in Git, the part after the last dot in a configuration
variable key, for example "c" for "a.b.c", was called the "variable
name part" of a configuration key. It would be very confusing to use
"variable name part" or some similar terms in the context of the
'promisor-remote' protocol though, so let's forget about it, and just
use "field", "field name" and "field value" instead.

Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
---
 promisor-remote.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/promisor-remote.c b/promisor-remote.c
index 5801ebfd9b..24d0e70132 100644
--- a/promisor-remote.c
+++ b/promisor-remote.c
@@ -314,10 +314,51 @@ static int allow_unsanitized(char ch)
 	return ch > 32 && ch < 127;
 }
 
-static void promisor_info_vecs(struct repository *repo,
-			       struct strvec *names,
-			       struct strvec *urls)
+/*
+ * Linked list for promisor remotes involved in the "promisor-remote"
+ * protocol capability.
+ *
+ * 'fields' contains a defined set of field name/value pairs for
+ * each promisor remote. Field names are stored in the 'string'
+ * member, and values in the 'util' member.
+ *
+ * Currently supported field names:
+ * - "name": The name of the promisor remote.
+ * - "url": The URL of the promisor remote.
+ *
+ * Except for "name", each "<field_name>/<field_value>" pair should
+ * correspond to a "remote.<name>.<field_name>" config variable set to
+ * <field_value> where "<name>" is a promisor remote name.
+ *
+ * 'fields' should not be sorted, as we will rely on the order we put
+ * things into it. So, for example, 'string_list_append()' should be
+ * used instead of 'string_list_insert()'.
+ */
+struct promisor_info {
+	struct promisor_info *next;
+	struct string_list fields;
+};
+
+static void promisor_info_list_free(struct promisor_info *p)
+{
+	struct promisor_info *next;
+
+	for (; p; p = next) {
+		next = p->next;
+		string_list_clear(&p->fields, 0);
+		free(p);
+	}
+}
+
+/*
+ * Prepare a 'struct promisor_info' linked list of promisor
+ * remotes. For each promisor remote, some of its fields, starting
+ * with "name" and "url", are put in the 'fields' string_list.
+ */
+static struct promisor_info *promisor_info_list(struct repository *repo)
 {
+	struct promisor_info *infos = NULL;
+	struct promisor_info **last_info = &infos;
 	struct promisor_remote *r;
 
 	promisor_remote_init(repo);
@@ -328,57 +369,78 @@ static void promisor_info_vecs(struct repository *repo,
 
 		/* Only add remotes with a non empty URL */
 		if (!git_config_get_string_tmp(url_key, &url) && *url) {
-			strvec_push(names, r->name);
-			strvec_push(urls, url);
+			struct promisor_info *new_info = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*new_info));
+
+			string_list_init_dup(&new_info->fields);
+			new_info->fields.cmp = strcasecmp;
+
+			string_list_append(&new_info->fields, "name")->util = (char *)r->name;
+			string_list_append(&new_info->fields, "url")->util = (char *)url;
+
+			*last_info = new_info;
+			last_info = &new_info->next;
 		}
 
 		free(url_key);
 	}
+
+	return infos;
 }
 
 char *promisor_remote_info(struct repository *repo)
 {
 	struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
 	int advertise_promisors = 0;
-	struct strvec names = STRVEC_INIT;
-	struct strvec urls = STRVEC_INIT;
+	struct promisor_info *info_list;
+	struct promisor_info *r;
 
 	git_config_get_bool("promisor.advertise", &advertise_promisors);
 
 	if (!advertise_promisors)
 		return NULL;
 
-	promisor_info_vecs(repo, &names, &urls);
+	info_list = promisor_info_list(repo);
 
-	if (!names.nr)
+	if (!info_list)
 		return NULL;
 
-	for (size_t i = 0; i < names.nr; i++) {
-		if (i)
+	for (r = info_list; r; r = r->next) {
+		struct string_list_item *item;
+		int first = 1;
+
+		if (r != info_list)
 			strbuf_addch(&sb, ';');
-		strbuf_addstr(&sb, "name=");
-		strbuf_addstr_urlencode(&sb, names.v[i], allow_unsanitized);
-		strbuf_addstr(&sb, ",url=");
-		strbuf_addstr_urlencode(&sb, urls.v[i], allow_unsanitized);
+
+		for_each_string_list_item(item, &r->fields) {
+			if (first)
+				first = 0;
+			else
+				strbuf_addch(&sb, ',');
+			strbuf_addf(&sb, "%s=", item->string);
+			strbuf_addstr_urlencode(&sb, (char *)item->util, allow_unsanitized);
+		}
 	}
 
-	strvec_clear(&names);
-	strvec_clear(&urls);
+	promisor_info_list_free(info_list);
 
 	return strbuf_detach(&sb, NULL);
 }
 
 /*
- * Find first index of 'nicks' where there is 'nick'. 'nick' is
- * compared case sensitively to the strings in 'nicks'. If not found
- * 'nicks->nr' is returned.
+ * Find first element of 'p' where the 'name' field is 'nick'. 'nick'
+ * is compared case sensitively to the strings in 'p'. If not found
+ * NULL is returned.
  */
-static size_t remote_nick_find(struct strvec *nicks, const char *nick)
+static struct promisor_info *remote_nick_find(struct promisor_info *p, const char *nick)
 {
-	for (size_t i = 0; i < nicks->nr; i++)
-		if (!strcmp(nicks->v[i], nick))
-			return i;
-	return nicks->nr;
+	for (; p; p = p->next) {
+		if (strcmp(p->fields.items[0].string, "name"))
+			BUG("First field of promisor info should be 'name', but was '%s'.",
+			    p->fields.items[0].string);
+		if (!strcmp(p->fields.items[0].util, nick))
+			return p;
+	}
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 enum accept_promisor {
@@ -390,16 +452,17 @@ enum accept_promisor {
 
 static int should_accept_remote(enum accept_promisor accept,
 				const char *remote_name, const char *remote_url,
-				struct strvec *names, struct strvec *urls)
+				struct promisor_info *info_list)
 {
-	size_t i;
+	struct promisor_info *p;
+	const char *local_url;
 
 	if (accept == ACCEPT_ALL)
 		return 1;
 
-	i = remote_nick_find(names, remote_name);
+	p = remote_nick_find(info_list, remote_name);
 
-	if (i >= names->nr)
+	if (!p)
 		/* We don't know about that remote */
 		return 0;
 
@@ -414,11 +477,18 @@ static int should_accept_remote(enum accept_promisor accept,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	if (!strcmp(urls->v[i], remote_url))
+	if (strcmp(p->fields.items[1].string, "url"))
+		BUG("Bad info_list for remote '%s'.\n"
+		    "Second field of promisor info should be 'url', but was '%s'.",
+		    remote_name, p->fields.items[1].string);
+
+	local_url = p->fields.items[1].util;
+
+	if (!strcmp(local_url, remote_url))
 		return 1;
 
 	warning(_("known remote named '%s' but with URL '%s' instead of '%s'"),
-		remote_name, urls->v[i], remote_url);
+		remote_name, local_url, remote_url);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -430,8 +500,7 @@ static void filter_promisor_remote(struct repository *repo,
 	struct strbuf **remotes;
 	const char *accept_str;
 	enum accept_promisor accept = ACCEPT_NONE;
-	struct strvec names = STRVEC_INIT;
-	struct strvec urls = STRVEC_INIT;
+	struct promisor_info *info_list = NULL;
 
 	if (!git_config_get_string_tmp("promisor.acceptfromserver", &accept_str)) {
 		if (!*accept_str || !strcasecmp("None", accept_str))
@@ -451,7 +520,7 @@ static void filter_promisor_remote(struct repository *repo,
 		return;
 
 	if (accept != ACCEPT_ALL)
-		promisor_info_vecs(repo, &names, &urls);
+		info_list = promisor_info_list(repo);
 
 	/* Parse remote info received */
 
@@ -482,7 +551,7 @@ static void filter_promisor_remote(struct repository *repo,
 		if (remote_url)
 			decoded_url = url_percent_decode(remote_url);
 
-		if (decoded_name && should_accept_remote(accept, decoded_name, decoded_url, &names, &urls))
+		if (decoded_name && should_accept_remote(accept, decoded_name, decoded_url, info_list))
 			strvec_push(accepted, decoded_name);
 
 		strbuf_list_free(elems);
@@ -490,8 +559,7 @@ static void filter_promisor_remote(struct repository *repo,
 		free(decoded_url);
 	}
 
-	strvec_clear(&names);
-	strvec_clear(&urls);
+	promisor_info_list_free(info_list);
 	strbuf_list_free(remotes);
 }
 
-- 
2.49.0.157.g09af0369a6


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-29 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-14 16:03 [PATCH 0/4] Make the "promisor-remote" capability support extra fields Christian Couder
2025-04-14 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] config: move is_config_key_char() to "config.h" Christian Couder
2025-04-14 16:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] promisor-remote: refactor to get rid of 'struct strvec' Christian Couder
2025-04-22 10:13   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 15:12     ` Christian Couder
2025-04-14 16:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] promisor-remote: allow a server to advertise extra fields Christian Couder
2025-04-14 22:04   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-22 10:13     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 15:12       ` Christian Couder
2025-04-29 15:12     ` Christian Couder
2025-04-14 16:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] promisor-remote: allow a client to check " Christian Couder
2025-04-29 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Make the "promisor-remote" capability support more fields Christian Couder
2025-04-29 14:52   ` Christian Couder [this message]
2025-05-07  8:25     ` [PATCH v2 1/3] promisor-remote: refactor to get rid of 'struct strvec' Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-19 14:10       ` Christian Couder
2025-05-07 12:27     ` Karthik Nayak
2025-05-19 14:10       ` Christian Couder
2025-04-29 14:52   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] promisor-remote: allow a server to advertise more fields Christian Couder
2025-05-07  8:25     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-19 14:11       ` Christian Couder
2025-05-27  7:50         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-27 15:30           ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-11 13:46           ` Christian Couder
2025-05-07 12:44     ` Karthik Nayak
2025-05-19 14:11       ` Christian Couder
2025-04-29 14:52   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] promisor-remote: allow a client to check fields Christian Couder
2025-05-07  8:25     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-19 14:11       ` Christian Couder
2025-05-02  9:34   ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Make the "promisor-remote" capability support more fields Christian Couder
2025-05-19 14:12   ` [PATCH v3 0/5] " Christian Couder
2025-05-19 14:12     ` [PATCH v3 1/5] promisor-remote: refactor to get rid of 'struct strvec' Christian Couder
2025-05-20  9:37       ` Karthik Nayak
2025-05-20 13:32         ` Christian Couder
2025-05-20 16:45           ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-21  6:33             ` Christian Couder
2025-05-21 15:00               ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-11 13:47                 ` Christian Couder
2025-05-19 14:12     ` [PATCH v3 2/5] promisor-remote: allow a server to advertise more fields Christian Couder
2025-05-21 20:31       ` Justin Tobler
2025-06-11 13:46         ` Christian Couder
2025-05-27  7:51       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-06-11 13:46         ` Christian Couder
2025-05-19 14:12     ` [PATCH v3 3/5] promisor-remote: refactor how we parse advertised fields Christian Couder
2025-05-19 14:12     ` [PATCH v3 4/5] promisor-remote: allow a client to check fields Christian Couder
2025-05-19 14:12     ` [PATCH v3 5/5] promisor-remote: use string constants for 'name' and 'url' too Christian Couder
2025-06-11 13:45     ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Make the "promisor-remote" capability support more fields Christian Couder
2025-06-11 13:45       ` [PATCH v4 1/5] promisor-remote: refactor to get rid of 'struct strvec' Christian Couder
2025-06-19 11:53         ` Karthik Nayak
2025-06-25 12:53           ` Christian Couder
2025-06-23 19:38         ` Justin Tobler
2025-06-25 12:52           ` Christian Couder
2025-06-11 13:45       ` [PATCH v4 2/5] promisor-remote: allow a server to advertise more fields Christian Couder
2025-06-19 12:15         ` Karthik Nayak
2025-06-25 12:51           ` Christian Couder
2025-06-23 19:59         ` Justin Tobler
2025-06-25 12:51           ` Christian Couder
2025-06-11 13:45       ` [PATCH v4 3/5] promisor-remote: refactor how we parse advertised fields Christian Couder
2025-06-11 13:45       ` [PATCH v4 4/5] promisor-remote: allow a client to check fields Christian Couder
2025-06-11 13:45       ` [PATCH v4 5/5] promisor-remote: use string constants for 'name' and 'url' too Christian Couder
2025-06-19 12:18       ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Make the "promisor-remote" capability support more fields Karthik Nayak
2025-06-25 12:50       ` [PATCH v5 " Christian Couder
2025-06-25 12:50         ` [PATCH v5 1/5] promisor-remote: refactor to get rid of 'struct strvec' Christian Couder
2025-06-25 17:05           ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-21 14:08             ` Christian Couder
2025-06-25 12:50         ` [PATCH v5 2/5] promisor-remote: allow a server to advertise more fields Christian Couder
2025-06-25 22:29           ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-21 14:09             ` Christian Couder
2025-07-21 18:53               ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-31  7:20                 ` Christian Couder
2025-06-27 18:47           ` Jean-Noël Avila
2025-07-21 14:09             ` Christian Couder
2025-06-25 12:50         ` [PATCH v5 3/5] promisor-remote: refactor how we parse advertised fields Christian Couder
2025-06-25 12:50         ` [PATCH v5 4/5] promisor-remote: allow a client to check fields Christian Couder
2025-06-25 12:50         ` [PATCH v5 5/5] promisor-remote: use string constants for 'name' and 'url' too Christian Couder
2025-07-07 22:35         ` [PATCH v5 0/5] Make the "promisor-remote" capability support more fields Junio C Hamano
2025-07-08  3:34           ` Christian Couder
2025-07-21 14:10         ` [PATCH v6 " Christian Couder
2025-07-21 14:10           ` [PATCH v6 1/5] promisor-remote: refactor to get rid of 'struct strvec' Christian Couder
2025-07-21 14:10           ` [PATCH v6 2/5] promisor-remote: allow a server to advertise more fields Christian Couder
2025-07-21 14:10           ` [PATCH v6 3/5] promisor-remote: refactor how we parse advertised fields Christian Couder
2025-07-21 20:39             ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-31  7:22               ` Christian Couder
2025-07-21 14:10           ` [PATCH v6 4/5] promisor-remote: allow a client to check fields Christian Couder
2025-07-21 20:59             ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-31  7:21               ` Christian Couder
2025-07-21 14:10           ` [PATCH v6 5/5] promisor-remote: use string constants for 'name' and 'url' too Christian Couder
2025-07-21 20:18             ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-31  7:23           ` [PATCH v7 0/5] Make the "promisor-remote" capability support more fields Christian Couder
2025-07-31  7:23             ` [PATCH v7 1/5] promisor-remote: refactor to get rid of 'struct strvec' Christian Couder
2025-07-31  7:23             ` [PATCH v7 2/5] promisor-remote: allow a server to advertise more fields Christian Couder
2025-07-31  7:23             ` [PATCH v7 3/5] promisor-remote: refactor how we parse advertised fields Christian Couder
2025-07-31 16:03               ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-08  5:31                 ` Christian Couder
2025-07-31  7:23             ` [PATCH v7 4/5] promisor-remote: allow a client to check fields Christian Couder
2025-07-31  7:23             ` [PATCH v7 5/5] promisor-remote: use string constants for 'name' and 'url' too Christian Couder
2025-07-31 15:48             ` [PATCH v7 0/5] Make the "promisor-remote" capability support more fields Junio C Hamano
2025-08-28 23:32             ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-08  5:36               ` Christian Couder
2025-09-08  5:30             ` [PATCH v8 0/7] " Christian Couder
2025-09-08  5:30               ` [PATCH v8 1/7] promisor-remote: refactor to get rid of 'struct strvec' Christian Couder
2025-09-08  5:30               ` [PATCH v8 2/7] promisor-remote: allow a server to advertise more fields Christian Couder
2025-09-08  5:30               ` [PATCH v8 3/7] promisor-remote: use string constants for 'name' and 'url' too Christian Couder
2025-09-08  5:30               ` [PATCH v8 4/7] promisor-remote: refactor how we parse advertised fields Christian Couder
2025-09-08  5:30               ` [PATCH v8 5/7] promisor-remote: use string_list_split() in filter_promisor_remote() Christian Couder
2025-09-08  5:30               ` [PATCH v8 6/7] promisor-remote: allow a client to check fields Christian Couder
2025-09-08  5:30               ` [PATCH v8 7/7] promisor-remote: use string_list_split() in mark_remotes_as_accepted() Christian Couder
2025-09-08 17:34               ` [PATCH v8 0/7] Make the "promisor-remote" capability support more fields Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250429145243.992252-2-christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --to=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).