From: Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] fetch --prune performance problem
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 14:08:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250618211024.2332525-1-phil.hord@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com>
`git fetch --prune` runs in O(N^2) time normally. This happens because the code
iterates over each ref to be pruned to display its status. In a repo with
174,000 refs, where I was pruning 15,000 refs, the current code made 2.6 billion
calls to strcmp and consumed 470 seconds of CPU. After this change, the same
operation completes in under 1 second.
The loop looks like this:
for p in prune_refs { for ref in all_refs { if p == ref { ... }}}
That loop runs only to check for and report newly dangling refs. A workaround to
avoid this slowness is to run with `-q` to bypass this check.
There is similar check/report functionality in `git remote prune`, but it uses a
more efficient method to check for dangling refs. prune_refs is first sorted, so
it can be searched in O(logN), so this loop is O(N*logN).
for ref in all_refs { if ref in prune_refs { ... }}
My patch fixes this for fetch, but it affects the command's output order.
Currently the results look like this:
- [deleted] (none) -> origin/bar
(origin/bar has become dangling)
- [deleted] (none) -> origin/baz
- [deleted] (none) -> origin/foo
(origin/foo has become dangling)
- [deleted] (none) -> origin/frotz
After my change, the order will change so the danglers are reported at the end.
- [deleted] (none) -> origin/bar
- [deleted] (none) -> origin/baz
- [deleted] (none) -> origin/foo
- [deleted] (none) -> origin/frotz
(origin/bar has become dangling)
(origin/foo has become dangling)
The latter format is close to how `git remote prune` works, but the formatting
is a bit different. I can coerce my change into something that preserves the
original order, but it will be quite a bit messier.
Q: Does anyone care enough about the command output ordering that they think
it's worth the extra code complexity?
Phil Hord (2):
fetch-prune: optimize dangling-ref reporting
refs: remove old refs_warn_dangling_symref
builtin/fetch.c | 16 ++++++++--------
refs.c | 17 +----------------
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
--
2.50.0.1.gf2ab606906.dirty
next reply other threads:[~2025-06-18 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-18 21:08 Phil Hord [this message]
2025-06-18 21:08 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] fetch-prune: optimize dangling-ref reporting Phil Hord
2025-06-18 21:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-18 23:18 ` Jacob Keller
2025-06-19 4:00 ` Jeff King
2025-06-19 11:01 ` Lidong Yan
2025-06-19 14:41 ` Lidong Yan
2025-06-18 21:08 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] refs: remove old refs_warn_dangling_symref Phil Hord
2025-06-18 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] fetch --prune performance problem Jacob Keller
2025-06-19 3:37 ` Jeff King
2025-06-19 17:18 ` Junio C Hamano
[not found] ` <CABURp0p4d0JPg=-cW1OZdFQJ+vNT_0PDd9Rv3oz6toFGqGv5=g@mail.gmail.com>
2025-06-23 23:32 ` Jacob Keller
2025-06-23 23:41 ` Junio C Hamano
[not found] ` <CABURp0q-1FGmD+PJeSQ=xvyDN6ZYn1O7Fh8i1OojfD2WQCqgcw@mail.gmail.com>
2025-06-23 23:46 ` Jacob Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250618211024.2332525-1-phil.hord@gmail.com \
--to=phil.hord@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).