git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] fetch --prune performance problem
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 14:08:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250618211024.2332525-1-phil.hord@gmail.com> (raw)

From: Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com>

`git fetch --prune` runs in O(N^2) time normally. This happens because the code
iterates over each ref to be pruned to display its status. In a repo with
174,000 refs, where I was pruning 15,000 refs, the current code made 2.6 billion
calls to strcmp and consumed 470 seconds of CPU. After this change, the same
operation completes in under 1 second.

The loop looks like this:

    for p in prune_refs { for ref in all_refs { if p == ref { ... }}}

That loop runs only to check for and report newly dangling refs. A workaround to
avoid this slowness is to run with `-q` to bypass this check.

There is similar check/report functionality in `git remote prune`, but it uses a
more efficient method to check for dangling refs. prune_refs is first sorted, so
it can be searched in O(logN), so this loop is O(N*logN).

    for ref in all_refs { if ref in prune_refs { ... }}

My patch fixes this for fetch, but it affects the command's output order.
Currently the results look like this:

     - [deleted]     (none) -> origin/bar
       (origin/bar has become dangling)
     - [deleted]     (none) -> origin/baz
     - [deleted]     (none) -> origin/foo
       (origin/foo has become dangling)
     - [deleted]     (none) -> origin/frotz

After my change, the order will change so the danglers are reported at the end.

     - [deleted]     (none) -> origin/bar
     - [deleted]     (none) -> origin/baz
     - [deleted]     (none) -> origin/foo
     - [deleted]     (none) -> origin/frotz
       (origin/bar has become dangling)
       (origin/foo has become dangling)

The latter format is close to how `git remote prune` works, but the formatting
is a bit different. I can coerce my change into something that preserves the
original order, but it will be quite a bit messier.

Q: Does anyone care enough about the command output ordering that they think
   it's worth the extra code complexity?

Phil Hord (2):
  fetch-prune: optimize dangling-ref reporting
  refs: remove old refs_warn_dangling_symref

 builtin/fetch.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 refs.c          | 17 +----------------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

-- 
2.50.0.1.gf2ab606906.dirty


             reply	other threads:[~2025-06-18 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-18 21:08 Phil Hord [this message]
2025-06-18 21:08 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] fetch-prune: optimize dangling-ref reporting Phil Hord
2025-06-18 21:50   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-18 23:18   ` Jacob Keller
2025-06-19  4:00   ` Jeff King
2025-06-19 11:01     ` Lidong Yan
2025-06-19 14:41       ` Lidong Yan
2025-06-18 21:08 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] refs: remove old refs_warn_dangling_symref Phil Hord
2025-06-18 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] fetch --prune performance problem Jacob Keller
2025-06-19  3:37   ` Jeff King
2025-06-19 17:18     ` Junio C Hamano
     [not found]     ` <CABURp0p4d0JPg=-cW1OZdFQJ+vNT_0PDd9Rv3oz6toFGqGv5=g@mail.gmail.com>
2025-06-23 23:32       ` Jacob Keller
2025-06-23 23:41         ` Junio C Hamano
     [not found]         ` <CABURp0q-1FGmD+PJeSQ=xvyDN6ZYn1O7Fh8i1OojfD2WQCqgcw@mail.gmail.com>
2025-06-23 23:46           ` Jacob Keller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250618211024.2332525-1-phil.hord@gmail.com \
    --to=phil.hord@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).