From: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ps@pks.im, gitster@pobox.com, me@ttaylorr.com,
karthik.188@gmail.com, Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/6] bulk-checkin: remove ODB transaction nesting
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:29:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250916182938.2193476-2-jltobler@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916182938.2193476-1-jltobler@gmail.com>
ODB transactions support being nested. Only the outermost
{begin,end}_odb_transaction() start and finish a transaction. This
allows internal object write codepaths to be optimized with ODB
transactions without worrying about whether a transaction is already
active. When {begin,end}_odb_transaction() is invoked during an active
transaction, these operations are essentially treated as no-ops. This
can make the interface a bit awkward to use, as calling
end_odb_transaction() does not guarantee that a transaction is actually
ended. Thus, in situations where a transaction needs to be explicitly
flushed, flush_odb_transaction() must be used.
To remove the need for an explicit transaction flush operation via
flush_odb_transaction() and better clarify transaction semantics, drop
the transaction nesting mechanism in favor of begin_odb_transaction()
returning a NULL transaction value to signal it was a no-op, and
end_odb_transaction() behaving as a no-op when a NULL transaction value
is passed. This is safe for existing callers as the transaction value
wired to end_odb_transaction() already comes from
begin_odb_transaction() and thus continues the same no-op behavior when
a transaction is already pending. With this model, passing a pending
transaction to end_odb_transaction() ensures it is committed at that
point in time.
Signed-off-by: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
---
bulk-checkin.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
bulk-checkin.h | 8 +++-----
object-file.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bulk-checkin.c b/bulk-checkin.c
index 124c493067..eb6ef704c3 100644
--- a/bulk-checkin.c
+++ b/bulk-checkin.c
@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ struct bulk_checkin_packfile {
struct odb_transaction {
struct object_database *odb;
- int nesting;
struct tmp_objdir *objdir;
struct bulk_checkin_packfile packfile;
};
@@ -368,12 +367,11 @@ void fsync_loose_object_bulk_checkin(struct odb_transaction *transaction,
struct odb_transaction *begin_odb_transaction(struct object_database *odb)
{
- if (!odb->transaction) {
- CALLOC_ARRAY(odb->transaction, 1);
- odb->transaction->odb = odb;
- }
+ if (odb->transaction)
+ return NULL;
- odb->transaction->nesting += 1;
+ CALLOC_ARRAY(odb->transaction, 1);
+ odb->transaction->odb = odb;
return odb->transaction;
}
@@ -389,14 +387,14 @@ void flush_odb_transaction(struct odb_transaction *transaction)
void end_odb_transaction(struct odb_transaction *transaction)
{
- if (!transaction || transaction->nesting == 0)
- BUG("Unbalanced ODB transaction nesting");
-
- transaction->nesting -= 1;
-
- if (transaction->nesting)
+ if (!transaction)
return;
+ /*
+ * Ensure the transaction ending matches the pending transaction.
+ */
+ ASSERT(transaction == transaction->odb->transaction);
+
flush_odb_transaction(transaction);
transaction->odb->transaction = NULL;
free(transaction);
diff --git a/bulk-checkin.h b/bulk-checkin.h
index ac8887f476..51d0ac6134 100644
--- a/bulk-checkin.h
+++ b/bulk-checkin.h
@@ -38,9 +38,8 @@ int index_blob_bulk_checkin(struct odb_transaction *transaction,
/*
* Tell the object database to optimize for adding
* multiple objects. end_odb_transaction must be called
- * to make new objects visible. Transactions can be nested,
- * and objects are only visible after the outermost transaction
- * is complete or the transaction is flushed.
+ * to make new objects visible. If a transaction is already
+ * pending, NULL is returned.
*/
struct odb_transaction *begin_odb_transaction(struct object_database *odb);
@@ -53,8 +52,7 @@ void flush_odb_transaction(struct odb_transaction *transaction);
/*
* Tell the object database to make any objects from the
- * current transaction visible if this is the final nested
- * transaction.
+ * current transaction visible.
*/
void end_odb_transaction(struct odb_transaction *transaction);
diff --git a/object-file.c b/object-file.c
index bc15af4245..5e76573549 100644
--- a/object-file.c
+++ b/object-file.c
@@ -1267,7 +1267,7 @@ int index_fd(struct index_state *istate, struct object_id *oid,
struct odb_transaction *transaction;
transaction = begin_odb_transaction(the_repository->objects);
- ret = index_blob_bulk_checkin(transaction,
+ ret = index_blob_bulk_checkin(the_repository->objects->transaction,
oid, fd, xsize_t(st->st_size),
path, flags);
end_odb_transaction(transaction);
--
2.51.0.193.g4975ec3473b
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-16 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-09 19:11 [PATCH 0/6] odb: add transaction interfaces to ODB subsystem Justin Tobler
2025-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH 1/6] bulk-checkin: remove ODB transaction nesting Justin Tobler
2025-09-11 6:40 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-11 15:17 ` Justin Tobler
2025-09-15 23:36 ` Taylor Blau
2025-09-16 2:55 ` Justin Tobler
2025-09-16 16:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-16 17:47 ` Justin Tobler
2025-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH 2/6] builtin/update-index: end ODB transaction when --verbose is specified Justin Tobler
2025-09-11 6:40 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-11 15:34 ` Justin Tobler
2025-09-15 6:08 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-15 17:08 ` Justin Tobler
2025-09-15 22:03 ` Justin Tobler
2025-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH 3/6] bulk-checkin: drop flush_odb_transaction() Justin Tobler
2025-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH 4/6] object-file: relocate ODB transaction code Justin Tobler
2025-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH 5/6] object-file: update naming from bulk-checkin Justin Tobler
2025-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH 6/6] odb: add transaction interface Justin Tobler
2025-09-11 6:40 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-11 16:31 ` Justin Tobler
2025-09-15 20:29 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] odb: add transaction interfaces to ODB subsystem Justin Tobler
2025-09-15 20:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] bulk-checkin: remove ODB transaction nesting Justin Tobler
2025-09-16 7:57 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-09-16 15:00 ` Justin Tobler
2025-09-15 20:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] builtin/update-index: end ODB transaction when --verbose is specified Justin Tobler
2025-09-16 9:07 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-09-16 15:17 ` Justin Tobler
2025-09-15 20:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] bulk-checkin: drop flush_odb_transaction() Justin Tobler
2025-09-15 20:29 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] object-file: relocate ODB transaction code Justin Tobler
2025-09-15 20:29 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] object-file: update naming from bulk-checkin Justin Tobler
2025-09-15 20:29 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] odb: add transaction interface Justin Tobler
2025-09-16 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] odb: add transaction interfaces to ODB subsystem Justin Tobler
2025-09-16 18:29 ` Justin Tobler [this message]
2025-09-16 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] builtin/update-index: end ODB transaction when --verbose is specified Justin Tobler
2025-09-16 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] bulk-checkin: drop flush_odb_transaction() Justin Tobler
2025-09-16 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] object-file: relocate ODB transaction code Justin Tobler
2025-09-16 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] object-file: update naming from bulk-checkin Justin Tobler
2025-09-16 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] odb: add transaction interface Justin Tobler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250916182938.2193476-2-jltobler@gmail.com \
--to=jltobler@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).