From: Usman Akinyemi <usmanakinyemi202@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com
Cc: christian.couder@gmail.com, me@ttaylorr.com,
phillip.wood123@gmail.com, ps@pks.im
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] push: add support for pushing to remote groups
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 04:02:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260305223248.170785-1-usmanakinyemi202@gmail.com> (raw)
This RFC series adds support for `git push` to accept a remote group
name (as configured via `remotes.<name>` in config) in addition to a
single remote name, mirroring the behaviour that `git fetch` has
supported for some time.
A user with multiple remotes configured as a group can now do:
git push all-remotes
instead of pushing to each remote individually, in the same way that:
git fetch all-remotes
already works.
The series is split into two patches:
- Patch 1 moves `get_remote_group`, `add_remote_or_group`, and the
`remote_group_data` struct out of builtin/fetch.c and into
remote.c/remote.h, making them part of the public remote API.
- Patch 2 extends builtin/push.c to use the newly public
`add_remote_or_group()` to resolve the repository argument as
either a single remote or a group, and pushes to each member of
the group in turn.
RFC notes and open questions:
- The current implementation pushes to group members sequentially.
A follow-up could add push.parallel (mirroring fetch.parallel) to
allow parallel pushes to group members via run_processes_parallel(),
the same mechanism fetch uses. Feedback on whether this is
desirable for push is welcome.
- push.default = simple interacts poorly with group pushes when the
current branch has no upstream set, since setup_default_push_refspecs()
will die on the first remote that is not the upstream. Users should
use push.default = current or explicit refspecs for group pushes.
It is worth discussing whether the group push path should automatically
imply push.default = current, or whether a clear error message
directing the user to configure this would be sufficient.
- force-with-lease semantics across a group push are currently
unmodified — the same CAS constraints are forwarded to every remote
in the group. Whether this is the right behaviour or whether
per-remote lease tracking is needed is an open question.
- I will also add the tests and documentations in the next iterations
Usman Akinyemi (2):
remote: move remote group resolution to remote.c
push: support pushing to a remote group
builtin/fetch.c | 42 -----------------------
builtin/push.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
remote.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++
remote.h | 12 +++++++
4 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-05 22:32 Usman Akinyemi [this message]
2026-03-05 22:32 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] remote: move remote group resolution to remote.c Usman Akinyemi
2026-03-06 18:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-09 0:43 ` Usman Akinyemi
2026-03-05 22:32 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] push: support pushing to a remote group Usman Akinyemi
2026-03-07 2:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-09 0:56 ` Usman Akinyemi
2026-03-09 13:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-18 20:40 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] push: add support for pushing to remote groups Usman Akinyemi
2026-03-18 20:40 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] remote: move remote group resolution to remote.c Usman Akinyemi
2026-03-18 20:40 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] push: support pushing to a remote group Usman Akinyemi
2026-03-18 20:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-18 21:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-18 22:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-19 17:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-25 18:42 ` Usman Akinyemi
2026-03-18 21:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] push: add support for pushing to remote groups Junio C Hamano
2026-03-18 23:13 ` Usman Akinyemi
2026-03-25 19:09 ` [RFC PATCH v3 " Usman Akinyemi
2026-03-25 19:09 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] remote: move remote group resolution to remote.c Usman Akinyemi
2026-03-25 19:09 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] push: support pushing to a remote group Usman Akinyemi
2026-03-25 19:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-27 22:18 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260305223248.170785-1-usmanakinyemi202@gmail.com \
--to=usmanakinyemi202@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox