Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Deveshi Dwivedi <deveshigurgaon@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ben.knoble@gmail.com, mroik@delayed.space,
	quentin.bernet@bluewin.ch, gitster@pobox.com,
	Deveshi Dwivedi <deveshigurgaon@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4] stash: infer "push" when command line starts with an option
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 19:52:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260412195204.4636-1-deveshigurgaon@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260404143640.6679-1-deveshigurgaon@gmail.com>

When "git stash" is run without the "push" subcommand, the command
tries to assume "push" but rejects any non-option arguments (i.e.,
pathspecs without "--") to avoid treating a misspelled subcommand
name as a pathspec.  The only exception is "-p", which sets
force_assume and allows pathspecs to follow.

This means "git stash -m foo file" is rejected even though "-m" is
clearly an option and not a subcommand name, and the user's intent
is clear.  The same applies to any command line that begins with an
option.

A command line that begins with an option cannot be naming a "git
stash" subcommand, so unconditionally assume "push" in that case and
allow pathspec arguments to follow without requiring "--".  This is
simpler and more robust than checking a specific list of options,
and remains correct even if push or other subcommands gain new
options in the future.

Note that this does not check for negated options, so "git stash
--no-staged [<pathspec>]" is still rejected.  Handling negated
options would require teaching the inference logic about them
explicitly.

This was marked as #leftoverbits in [1].

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqtsu1jipp.fsf@gitster.g/

Signed-off-by: Deveshi Dwivedi <deveshigurgaon@gmail.com>
---

Changes since v3:
  - Rewrote the approach per Junio and Phillip's suggestion: instead of
    checking a specific list of push-only options, unconditionally
    assume "push" whenever the command line begins with any option.
    This is simpler and robust against future option additions, and
    sidesteps the fact that -m and --include-untracked are not unique
    to "push".
  - Updated the test to reflect the new rule and switched cleanup to
    test_when_finished per Junio's suggestion.
  - Updated documentation accordingly.

 Documentation/git-stash.adoc |  7 ++++---
 builtin/stash.c              |  6 ++++--
 t/t3903-stash.sh             | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/git-stash.adoc b/Documentation/git-stash.adoc
index 235d57ddd8..135719611a 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-stash.adoc
+++ b/Documentation/git-stash.adoc
@@ -61,9 +61,10 @@ COMMANDS
 +
 For quickly making a snapshot, you can omit "push".  In this mode,
 non-option arguments are not allowed to prevent a misspelled
-subcommand from making an unwanted stash entry.  The two exceptions to this
-are `stash -p` which acts as alias for `stash push -p` and pathspec elements,
-which are allowed after a double hyphen `--` for disambiguation.
+subcommand from making an unwanted stash entry.  Pathspec elements
+are allowed after a double hyphen `--` for disambiguation.  When
+the command line begins with an option, "push" is inferred and
+pathspec arguments are also accepted without `--`.
 
 `save [-p | --patch] [-S | --staged] [-k | --[no-]keep-index] [-u | --include-untracked] [-a | --all] [-q | --quiet] [<message>]`::
 
diff --git a/builtin/stash.c b/builtin/stash.c
index 95c5005b0b..be96338d35 100644
--- a/builtin/stash.c
+++ b/builtin/stash.c
@@ -1871,13 +1871,15 @@ static int push_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,
 	if (argc) {
 		int flags = PARSE_OPT_KEEP_DASHDASH;
 
-		if (push_assumed)
+		if (push_assumed) {
 			flags |= PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION;
+			if (argc > 1 && argv[1][0] == '-')
+				force_assume = 1;
+		}
 
 		argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix, options,
 				     push_assumed ? git_stash_usage :
 				     git_stash_push_usage, flags);
-		force_assume |= patch_mode;
 	}
 
 	if (argc) {
diff --git a/t/t3903-stash.sh b/t/t3903-stash.sh
index 70879941c2..88f2b3c86b 100755
--- a/t/t3903-stash.sh
+++ b/t/t3903-stash.sh
@@ -410,8 +410,30 @@ test_expect_success 'stash --staged with binary file' '
 '
 
 test_expect_success 'dont assume push with non-option args' '
-	test_must_fail git stash -q drop 2>err &&
-	test_grep -e "subcommand wasn'\''t specified; '\''push'\'' can'\''t be assumed due to unexpected token '\''drop'\''" err
+	test_must_fail git stash someunknown 2>err &&
+	test_grep -e "subcommand wasn'\''t specified; '\''push'\'' can'\''t be assumed due to unexpected token '\''someunknown'\''" err
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'assume push when command line starts with option' '
+	test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
+	test_when_finished "rm -f untracked-file" &&
+	echo changed >file &&
+	git add file &&
+	git stash -m "implied push" file &&
+	git stash pop &&
+
+	git add file &&
+	git stash --staged file &&
+	git stash pop &&
+
+	git add file &&
+	git stash --keep-index file &&
+	git stash pop &&
+
+	echo untracked >untracked-file &&
+	git stash --include-untracked untracked-file &&
+	test_path_is_missing untracked-file &&
+	git stash pop
 '
 
 test_expect_success 'stash --invalid-option' '

base-commit: 2855562ca6a9c6b0e7bc780b050c1e83c9fcfbd0
-- 
2.52.0.230.gd8af7cadaa


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-12 19:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-04 14:36 [PATCH] stash: infer "push" when push-specific options are given Deveshi Dwivedi
2026-04-04 15:19 ` Mirko Faina
2026-04-04 16:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Deveshi Dwivedi
2026-04-04 23:40   ` Mirko Faina
2026-04-05  7:02     ` Deveshi Dwivedi
2026-04-05 11:09 ` [PATCH v3] " Deveshi Dwivedi
2026-04-06 18:15   ` Mirko Faina
2026-04-07  9:36     ` Phillip Wood
2026-04-09 19:22       ` Deveshi Dwivedi
2026-04-09 19:37         ` Mirko Faina
2026-04-09 20:31       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-04-09 20:22   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-04-12 19:52 ` Deveshi Dwivedi [this message]
2026-04-13  9:08   ` [PATCH v4] stash: infer "push" when command line starts with an option Phillip Wood
2026-04-13 15:09   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-04-19 16:54 ` [PATCH v5] stash: assume " Deveshi Dwivedi
2026-04-21 15:28   ` Phillip Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260412195204.4636-1-deveshigurgaon@gmail.com \
    --to=deveshigurgaon@gmail.com \
    --cc=ben.knoble@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=mroik@delayed.space \
    --cc=quentin.bernet@bluewin.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox