From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cloud.peff.net (cloud.peff.net [217.216.95.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E923B21D3D6 for ; Sun, 12 Apr 2026 19:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.216.95.84 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776023827; cv=none; b=pEkuM7FHAHk5XrXAUinnTUQ+rTQPBMTKME6vTylSFc/GpkwpjhA8sissd/2WfLP/TWX6kgvo4kehb/hOv0+5ImyGf7UNmgBlyTJFVi/vBb5bt2E388jCz4oB/tD3g2IPMmKZFlEKbUPMo+Yro5Q1Wg4dlkfMEACVqRg5qVP6bhA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776023827; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZmsbUKCcmSfI+F/FvAHHNHAZyn8DaqE1//tCFHPsG5k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=h10Zto7L9v+trf+0DhQCDxPqOEoZNBSEax36ZPYT1a4LCGG/46CiI9MTLmYywaFL+qO8B4fhO3PtSZNyZftXznFAKtwhHg9YuHPEXovNb5Q08kGPmE+Ff1lLEu6QJS94aSTTGXzZJeUadulaXaSQAp9smkkz8MKdVyGD+N6IUVo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=peff.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=peff.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=peff.net header.i=@peff.net header.b=hhhH78MF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.216.95.84 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=peff.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=peff.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=peff.net header.i=@peff.net header.b="hhhH78MF" Received: (qmail 328847 invoked by uid 106); 12 Apr 2026 19:56:56 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=peff.net; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=20240930; bh=ZmsbUKCcmSfI+F/FvAHHNHAZyn8DaqE1//tCFHPsG5k=; b=hhhH78MF1pH2grVa1rSg+EzAwLKkUIzXDk/p5na7TGlwZqnXipAoNH343xnrnvyC8z2zlAuL/XocuA7XycNUYsxATB4RHwg33pKodESVvNOjE2qQUAuvcY4fyaES0+W05W7okqMgnNC9BhPWFiLMlV6je7J2Mzt7s1UXIRp0OUP0Sli2ebRTPYE4Aj67yAlR9ypRXNsog56UymWOlrfbHU/I5iHqZFEhDYdGoeCxwXO2KgNTnz1O5AZvHrH9pshtpj7uh20UjcMVmfEV8usQO+ngDeOGG4Gv527zGuKWVLcQQKm1xGM75+4uXv7I4u7P/9OIp3dxPh/eux1vo1ZJUQ== Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Apr 2026 19:56:56 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 544082 invoked by uid 111); 12 Apr 2026 19:56:56 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 12 Apr 2026 15:56:56 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 15:56:56 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Kristoffer Haugsbakk Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gitglossary: fix indentation of sub-lists Message-ID: <20260412195656.GA1691477@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20260411190625.GA754966@coredump.intra.peff.net> <236b32a3-a04b-4d20-8290-02a464037b1d@app.fastmail.com> <20260411214213.GA1563438@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20260411215518.GA1651019@coredump.intra.peff.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Sun, Apr 12, 2026 at 11:10:34AM +0200, Kristoffer Haugsbakk wrote: > > But asciidoc being asciidoc, of course that is not the end of the story. > > Ouch. > > > That technique works fine for the "glob" and "attr" lists in this patch, > > but under the "refs" item it works for only 1 of the 2 lists! I can't > > figure out why, and this may be an asciidoctor bug. But we can work > > You mention “asciidoc being asciidoc” but here it seems to be > about Asciidoctor? It is. I meant "asciidoc the language", not "asciidoc the tool". I didn't want to be too harsh on asciidoctor specifically. I think in aggregate the pain comes equally from both tools. ;) > > So using the extra blank line for the first two instances, and "--" > > markers for the second two, this patch produces identical output from > > "doc-diff HEAD^ HEAD" for both --asciidoctor and --ascii modes. > > Nit: s/--ascii/--asciidoc/ Oops, yes. -Peff