Re: unexpected auto-maintenance, was Re: git hogs the CPU, RAM and storage despite its config

[Jeff King <peff@peff.net>]

On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 08:42:11AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:

> In any case, I also agree with Stolee that it may have unintended
> consequences to unconditionally reassign tempfiles to the child process
> when daemonizing. It is okay for all current callers, but I'm not sure
> whether future callers would expect this behaviour.
> 
> An alternative would be to explicitly reassign the lockfile's ownership
> in git-maintenance(1). Something like the below patch.

I really think this should be an automatic part of daemonize(), for the
reasons I gave earlier in the thread. It's really a lurking problem for
any cleanup handler, but lockfiles are the one that is most likely to
bite us.

In fact, I thought "git gc --detach" without "--skip-foreground-tasks"
had the same bug, but it narrowly avoids it by dropping and reacquiring
the lock (!) on either side of the daemonize() call.

So I think you are more likely to avoid unpleasant surprises by baking
the behavior into daemonize() rather than requiring each caller to do it
manually.

Plus it keeps daemonize() a bit more abstract. It's a noop on Windows,
but you can imagine an implementation that does weird platform-specific
stuff and doesn't switch pids at all.

-Peff