From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cloud.peff.net (cloud.peff.net [217.216.95.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F32B01F938 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.216.95.84 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782693284; cv=none; b=l9jc8aUL9PzBJ42l1Z0ThDNVhII3pOm8LrUVbDFmS7apWgoFZMSDtG/wljYnQj1gDvsL7jWO5XDg+y706JuEHGaMnb51mgso5YynVD5TcW6BYeeSxDdDoVzbFQ3C5Srru4dqTNTG/DWNV2uqf4Bqwnbfk03Ie/Mzj/OBezrR1Uc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782693284; c=relaxed/simple; bh=X07GKoi3JwIbvD/mSCYKrmAB5LfMbjekvdufaWWG4rU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=edYXpK0+0Wkf1Vn+uU9Xc+6IbBAacqXfC2bLdbxP8oi6VjWjU3T7J/ixU9NdXSC+yFvU6QiW/l6230EWnHM+d+CI560HSrq83jq5gJ0SZXzaZRJAONAodp9b8ZClCiJ0adZY9KYRlXc2DpynOlZ7TUv1DohrC2AhRhHlZUWADGI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=peff.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=peff.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=peff.net header.i=@peff.net header.b=NVInn/f1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.216.95.84 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=peff.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=peff.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=peff.net header.i=@peff.net header.b="NVInn/f1" Received: (qmail 59542 invoked by uid 106); 29 Jun 2026 00:34:41 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=peff.net; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=20240930; bh=X07GKoi3JwIbvD/mSCYKrmAB5LfMbjekvdufaWWG4rU=; b=NVInn/f1FmCjS8t359xTOTumywGDgO29x8V4Yggxri6KTQZdxY3VRQbfNX7b7kF1z7N16QOBOe+r4G/TwGkM8/m5d0IkLUHEbdPm67g4qWCy0juZIRHxHWmx9RaX7odCShhXy9NMUWaq1JKlJUw5si6SgHAfoCLBWlWky8Juiqo5STFbxigh0BJZiwKksLpfNU3qRdFy6ZItLbBKPGxi1+I2P6GLZMfJ4sAHijxv33ar0Kj4p1r+LX47GUx3v9po791iSM73GNHeVGPQ9P5HnaG6ygp0HSKBUzUFaB14O6zZxMsNESnHTiCJQ8dZ0X1lR3u6vUekjkrFJWZeNxfVIg== Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:34:41 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 121467 invoked by uid 111); 29 Jun 2026 00:34:41 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 28 Jun 2026 20:34:41 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2026 20:34:34 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Michael Montalbo , Patrick Steinhardt , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] t5551: put many-tags case into its own repo Message-ID: <20260629003434.GA1228461@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20260628075716.GA3525066@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20260628080345.GB107826@coredump.intra.peff.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 02:44:32PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > > diff --git a/t/t5551-http-fetch-smart.sh b/t/t5551-http-fetch-smart.sh > > index e236e526f0..cd851f24b8 100755 > > --- a/t/t5551-http-fetch-smart.sh > > +++ b/t/t5551-http-fetch-smart.sh > > @@ -397,15 +397,16 @@ create_tags () { > > } > > > > test_expect_success 'create 2,000 tags in the repo' ' > > + git init "$HTTPD_DOCUMENT_ROOT_PATH/many-tags.git" && > > ( > > - cd "$HTTPD_DOCUMENT_ROOT_PATH/repo.git" && > > + cd "$HTTPD_DOCUMENT_ROOT_PATH/many-tags.git" && > > create_tags 1 2000 > > ) > > ' > > While all the other repositories used in this tests are bare > repositories, this new one is a non-bare repository. > > It shouldn't make any difference, but since I noticed it... Ah, yeah. It should work either way, but it is slightly confusing for it to be non-bare. I'll wait to re-send (though if nothing else comes up, it may be simpler for you to just amend on your side). -Peff