From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cloud.peff.net (cloud.peff.net [217.216.95.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E8193EB0EA for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 07:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.216.95.84 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784014300; cv=none; b=mgCZMLiwQht2XxDS1dPpHVAeMFmy0o2WkwE8cTAQ7YqiFAoNWQ86g/F9tRhqxnBhzMugFKmRYpejWEIg0Hyo1AqKycfiLzOVhEQv1fo9q6p+5qXCztuNctNRa6qVlv1fAkJnaLp0AAOB2SNs9tT2/xTTJkbVAFfD/Df8LmFmfa0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784014300; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZIPU20w5+V/CrFuhSaTbjTtnkVys1HvEHsQyOK75K10=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=WMTRikJYymPQ/zd/LnGLXLtzYpz+F6F0NCRbq2jYiAWQdnkaD0mfqeVFDPM/SAp0F42y7VUS2RSobEuu2R0hhyIlQNldYCT6Jnd8nyciNQEoCHaIx6NcII4qklRNP4ie4xVVFeC58cTcFiS60F/IXMQPSN21FElqE/F1/+XI5o0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=peff.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=peff.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=peff.net header.i=@peff.net header.b=Cw7gYUPA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.216.95.84 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=peff.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=peff.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=peff.net header.i=@peff.net header.b="Cw7gYUPA" Received: (qmail 21860 invoked by uid 106); 14 Jul 2026 07:31:38 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=peff.net; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=20240930; bh=ZIPU20w5+V/CrFuhSaTbjTtnkVys1HvEHsQyOK75K10=; b=Cw7gYUPAa/p1PHux728OIMKrsnE8tiP2rII0RtbJ96W4fQa7zasOKCGXaXo7hfTqOsKAm8niFrZAz50q+0NBeiOUW3mx32k/7CPj3Xq/JtpKF0dTDf862WoyCd/I3PsXZ6m6fJRxb2VivYPCuNi8mAHIsQm0NqMIYZfPQHzRjFMh1My12dOgnX504obk2uhAknjp8Oak6PlFnMF9dOR3et3eK+konXQoi1inQ3g9uhEyoCuK6VKcKHzs+WzJ7B8ZOiqMlYPxXWkRjNFNdnWP7b5s74PnBSYD0Zx6tg9xESD//EoHQhdOnmOjwMku6uRLOvKxOZys4gDfPYZnNO8OPA== Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 07:31:38 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 43146 invoked by uid 111); 14 Jul 2026 07:31:42 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 03:31:42 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 03:31:37 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Taylor Blau Cc: Ted Nyman , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Taylor Blau , Patrick Steinhardt , Karthik Nayak , "brian m. carlson" , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] packfile URIs: support concurrent downloads Message-ID: <20260714073137.GC4058320@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 07:42:25PM -0700, Taylor Blau wrote: > As some background, my workflow for sending patches to the mailing list > is to use a script called 'git mail' that effectively runs format-patch > to build an *.mbox and then opens Mutt in that directory. I then review > the patches one last time before sending, and then run a macro I have > bound to 'B', which (effectively) runs . > > For reasons that I cannot quite recall, I chose this workflow many years > ago when it would likely have been more appropriate to use `mutt -H`, > which does *not* rewrite Message-ID headers when resending. You might have inherited the thing from me. I thought I used it exactly because "-H" insisted on rewriting the message-id, but it doesn't seem to now. So either I've completely forgotten the reason, or perhaps the behavior used to be different. I also like that lets me open the whole mbox and send each message within a single session. But I never run into the issue you're mentioning because I write my cover letter separately as a normal email, and then generate the actual patches as in-reply-to (with some script magic to pull the message-id from my sent folder). So possibly my fault for leading you in the wrong direction many years ago, or your fault for not following my sage advice to the letter. ;) -Peff