From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: [PATCH] diff: ignore unmerged paths outside prefix with --relative --cached
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 02:05:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715060523.GA517940@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
A diff using --relative ignores entries outside the current directory.
This results in a segfault when we try to process an unmerged entry
that's outside of our prefix, since we end up with a NULL diff_filepair
and use it without checking that it's valid.
I think this bug goes back to 76399c0195 (diff.c: return filepair from
diff_unmerge(), 2011-04-22). Prior to that, diff_unmerge() knew to skip
entries outside of our prefix, due to cd676a5136 (diff --relative:
output paths as relative to the current subdirectory, 2008-02-12). Back
then the caller didn't care that we hadn't added anything to the queue.
In 76399c0195 that changed; we now returned the pair (or NULL), and the
caller in do_oneway_diff() was then called fill_filespec() itself. And
it does so without checking for NULL, causing a segfault.
The obvious fix is to skip the fill_filespec() call (after which we just
return), which this patch does.
There's another call to diff_unmerge() in run_diff_files(). That case
was already fixed by 8174627b3d (diff-lib: ignore paths that are outside
$cwd if --relative asked, 2021-08-22), but of course it didn't help us
for --cached.
That commit also claims that checking the result of diff_unmerge() is
not enough, as we'd want other code paths to skip the entry, too (even
if they wouldn't segfault). But as far as I can tell, that is not true
for --cached. We eventually end up in diff_queue_addremove() or in
diff_queue_change(), both of which know to return early when we're
outside of the prefix.
Arguably we could be checking at the top of oneway_diff() whether the
path is interesting at all. That would not only avoid this code path
entirely, but would also possibly save a small amount of work. But since
everything else appears to work OK, I went for the smallest fix here to
avoid any regression.
Specifically, a comment in oneway_diff() claims we're supposed to
advance o->pos, which we might fail to do if we return early. Though
that "advance" seems to have gone away in da165f470e (unpack-trees.c:
prepare for looking ahead in the index, 2010-01-07), so it is possible
the comment is simply out of date. We can explore that separately;
checking for a NULL return from diff_unmerge() seems like a sensible
thing to do regardless.
We can piggy-back on the tests added by 8174627b3d; we're just checking
the --cached variant.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
---
+cc Junio, as you may have some wisdom on that further exploration.
diff-lib.c | 2 +-
t/t4045-diff-relative.sh | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/diff-lib.c b/diff-lib.c
index ae91027a02..a23119b852 100644
--- a/diff-lib.c
+++ b/diff-lib.c
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static void do_oneway_diff(struct unpack_trees_options *o,
if (cached && idx && ce_stage(idx)) {
struct diff_filepair *pair;
pair = diff_unmerge(&revs->diffopt, idx->name);
- if (tree)
+ if (pair && tree)
fill_filespec(pair->one, &tree->oid, 1,
tree->ce_mode);
return;
diff --git a/t/t4045-diff-relative.sh b/t/t4045-diff-relative.sh
index 2c8493fe66..167be0bdcc 100755
--- a/t/t4045-diff-relative.sh
+++ b/t/t4045-diff-relative.sh
@@ -245,4 +245,13 @@ test_expect_failure 'diff --relative with change in subdir' '
test_cmp expected out
'
+test_expect_success 'diff --relative --cached with change in subdir' '
+ git switch br3 &&
+ test_when_finished "git merge --abort" &&
+ test_must_fail git merge sub1 &&
+ echo file0 >expected &&
+ git -C subdir diff --relative --name-only --cached >out &&
+ test_cmp expected out
+'
+
test_done
--
2.55.0.612.g68473ef936
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 6:05 Jeff King [this message]
2026-07-15 15:17 ` [PATCH] diff: ignore unmerged paths outside prefix with --relative --cached Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260715060523.GA517940@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox