Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ps@pks.im, gitster@pobox.com, kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com,
	 Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>,
	 Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] hook: introduce the report hook for git-receive-pack(1)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 15:34:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821-758-introduce-hook-v2-1-e90e2f7ac2cf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818-758-introduce-hook-v1-1-8a8d89e65838@gmail.com>

When running 'git-receive-pack(1)', there is no way for the server to
intercept and modify the status report before it is sent back to the
client. Servers with custom logic may need to transform or gate the
report based on the outcome of external logic post reference updates.

This is specially needed for our usecase at GitLab where we have custom
MVCC logic on top of Git which creates a new version for each push
operation. The new version is only committed when certain external
operations post reference transaction succeed. So reporting the correct
message based on the outcome of these operations is important.

We cannot use any of the existing hooks as:

  - The pre-receive hook runs too early, as we haven't updated
    references at that point yet and we need to have the full view of
    all resulting updates (both objects and references).

  - The update hook is too inefficient as it runs once per reference,
    and we cannot trivially determine the last update.

  - The reference-transaction hook cannot be used by us because we care
    about the phase where it was committed already. And while the hook
    fires in that phase, it does not allow the caller to modify the
    result in any capacity.

  - The post-receive and post-update hooks cannot be used as they run
    too late, at the point where we have already reported success to the
    client.

Introduce a new 'report' hook. The hook receives the complete pkt-line
encoded status report on standard input, after all ref updates have
been applied to the repository by execute_commands() but before the
report is sent to the client. The report consists of an 'unpack ok'
or 'unpack <error>' line, followed by one 'ok <refname>' or
'ng <refname> <reason>' line per pushed ref, terminated by a flush
packet.

The hook's stdout fully replaces the report sent to the client.
receive-pack fully buffers the hook's stdout before acting on the exit
status, so the exit code is known before the client receives anything.
This gives two distinct behaviours depending on exit status:

- Exit 0: the hook's stdout is used as the report. The hook can
  rewrite 'ok' lines to 'ng' lines to signal per-ref rejection to the
  client while receive-pack itself exits cleanly. The client marks
  rejected refs as '[remote rejected]' and exits with a non-zero
  status if any ref is 'ng'.

- Non-zero exit: the hook's stdout is discarded, receive-pack calls
  die(), and no report is sent to the client at all. The client
  observes a sideband disconnect and reports 'the remote end hung up
  unexpectedly', treating the entire push as failed.

In both cases, any output the hook writes to standard error is
forwarded to the client over the sideband channel and appears as
'remote:' lines on the client terminal. Writing to stderr alone does
not affect the push outcome.

Note that in either failure mode, ref updates already applied by
execute_commands() are not rolled back. The hook can cause the client
to perceive the push as failed, but cannot undo server-side changes.

This hook does not use the config-based hook infrastructure, which
supports running multiple scripts per hook event. This hook is a
bidirectional filter: it receives the report on stdin and writes a
modified version to stdout. Running multiple such scripts sequentially
would require piping the output of one into the input of the next,
which the current hook infrastructure does not support. A single-script
design is therefore a natural fit, and is consistent with how
'proc-receive' is structured for the same reason.

Helped-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Modify the documentation and commit message to be more verbose.
- Add documentation to 'git-receive-pack.adoc'
- Use 'ret' as the variable name for the return code.
- Modify the test to also check for the 'remote:'.
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260818-758-introduce-hook-v1-1-8a8d89e65838@gmail.com
---
 Documentation/git-receive-pack.adoc |  15 +++
 Documentation/githooks.adoc         |  51 +++++++++
 builtin/receive-pack.c              |  41 ++++++++
 t/meson.build                       |   1 +
 t/t5412-report-hook.sh              | 201 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 309 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/git-receive-pack.adoc b/Documentation/git-receive-pack.adoc
index 0956086d61..e6cc0acaaf 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-receive-pack.adoc
+++ b/Documentation/git-receive-pack.adoc
@@ -236,6 +236,21 @@ if the repository is packed and is served via a dumb transport.
 exec git update-server-info
 ----
 
+PROC-RECEIVE HOOK
+-----------------
+This hook is invoked by 'git-receive-pack' when it processes push
+requests. It handles refs whose names match the patterns defined by
+`receive.procReceiveRefs` and executes the actual ref updates. See
+linkgit:githooks[5] for the full protocol description.
+
+REPORT HOOK
+-----------
+This hook is invoked by 'git-receive-pack' after all the ref updates
+have been applied but before the report is sent to the client. The hook
+receives the complete report in pkt-line format on stdin and its stdout
+replaces the report sent to the client. Allowing the hook to rewrite
+the outcomes or abort the push completely. See linkgit:githooks[5] for
+the full protocol description.
 
 QUARANTINE ENVIRONMENT
 ----------------------
diff --git a/Documentation/githooks.adoc b/Documentation/githooks.adoc
index ed045940d1..06c9e4b017 100644
--- a/Documentation/githooks.adoc
+++ b/Documentation/githooks.adoc
@@ -527,6 +527,57 @@ The exit status of the hook is ignored for any state except for the
 status will cause the transaction to be aborted. The hook will not be
 called with "aborted" state in that case.
 
+report
+~~~~~~
+
+This hook is invoked by linkgit:git-receive-pack[1] when it reacts to
+`git push` and updates references in its repository. It executes on
+the repository once after all refs have been updated and after
+`execute_commands()` has applied all accepted ref changes to the
+repository, but before the pkt-line encoded status report is sent back
+to the client.
+
+The hook receives the complete pkt-line encoded status report on
+standard input. The report begins with an `unpack` line indicating
+whether the object transfer succeeded (`unpack ok` or
+`unpack <error>`), followed by one `ok <refname>` or
+`ng <refname> <reason>` line per ref that was pushed, and is
+terminated by a flush packet.
+
+The hook's standard output entirely replaces the report that is sent
+to the client. The hook must write a valid pkt-line encoded report in
+the same format it received. The hook's stdout is fully buffered by
+`receive-pack` before any data is sent to the client, so the hook's
+exit status is known before the client receives anything.
+
+There are two distinct ways the hook can affect the push outcome:
+
+* To reject individual ref updates while keeping `receive-pack` alive,
+  rewrite the corresponding `ok <refname>` lines to
+  `ng <refname> <reason>` lines in the output and exit with status 0.
+  The client will then mark those specific refs as rejected while
+  treating any `ok` refs as successful. The push as a whole is
+  considered failed if any ref is `ng`, and `git push` will exit with
+  a non-zero status on the client side.
+
+* To abort the entire push unconditionally, exit with a non-zero
+  status. In this case the hook's stdout is discarded, `receive-pack`
+  calls `die()`, and no report is sent to the client at all. The client
+  observes an unexpected sideband disconnect, making the entire push
+  appear to have failed. In general, the hook should never exit with a
+  non-zero status code and doing so would indicate a bug.
+
+Any output written to standard error is forwarded to the client over
+the sideband channel and will appear as `remote:` lines on clients
+using 'git-push(1)', regardless of the hook's exit status. Writing to
+standard error alone does not affect the push outcome.
+
+Note that by the time this hook runs, all ref updates have already been
+applied to the repository. Neither a non-zero exit nor rewriting refs
+to `ng` rolls back any ref changes that were already committed
+server-side. The hook can cause the client to perceive the push as
+failed, but cannot undo the server-side updates.
+
 push-to-checkout
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c
index 86933d8d7e..9a0905f67e 100644
--- a/builtin/receive-pack.c
+++ b/builtin/receive-pack.c
@@ -1004,6 +1004,41 @@ static int run_update_hook(struct command *cmd)
 	return code;
 }
 
+static int run_report_hook(struct strbuf *report)
+{
+	struct child_process proc = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
+	struct async sideband_async;
+	int sideband_async_started = 0;
+	int saved_stderr = -1;
+	struct strbuf out = STRBUF_INIT;
+	const char *hook_path;
+	int ret;
+
+	hook_path = find_hook(the_repository, "report");
+	if (!hook_path)
+		return 0;
+
+	strvec_push(&proc.args, hook_path);
+	proc.trace2_hook_name = "report";
+
+	prepare_sideband_async(&sideband_async, &saved_stderr,
+			       &sideband_async_started);
+
+	sigchain_push(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN);
+	ret = pipe_command(&proc, report->buf, report->len, &out,
+			   report->len, NULL, 0);
+	sigchain_pop(SIGPIPE);
+
+	finish_sideband_async(&sideband_async, saved_stderr,
+			      sideband_async_started);
+
+	if (!ret)
+		strbuf_swap(&out, report);
+
+	strbuf_release(&out);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static struct command *find_command_by_refname(struct command *list,
 					       const char *refname)
 {
@@ -2547,6 +2582,9 @@ static void report(struct command *commands, const char *unpack_status)
 	}
 	packet_buf_flush(&buf);
 
+	if (run_report_hook(&buf))
+		die("report hook failed");
+
 	if (use_sideband)
 		send_sideband(1, 1, buf.buf, buf.len, use_sideband);
 	else
@@ -2592,6 +2630,9 @@ static void report_v2(struct command *commands, const char *unpack_status)
 	}
 	packet_buf_flush(&buf);
 
+	if (run_report_hook(&buf))
+		die("report hook failed");
+
 	if (use_sideband)
 		send_sideband(1, 1, buf.buf, buf.len, use_sideband);
 	else
diff --git a/t/meson.build b/t/meson.build
index a25f37d2f5..7056e31326 100644
--- a/t/meson.build
+++ b/t/meson.build
@@ -651,6 +651,7 @@ integration_tests = [
   't5409-colorize-remote-messages.sh',
   't5410-receive-pack.sh',
   't5411-proc-receive-hook.sh',
+  't5412-report-hook.sh',
   't5500-fetch-pack.sh',
   't5501-fetch-push-alternates.sh',
   't5502-quickfetch.sh',
diff --git a/t/t5412-report-hook.sh b/t/t5412-report-hook.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000000..62e5174c58
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t5412-report-hook.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+test_description='test report hook'
+
+GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main
+export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME
+
+. ./test-lib.sh
+
+. "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/t5411/common-functions.sh
+
+URL_PREFIX="\.\."
+
+test_expect_success "setup workbench" '
+	git init workbench &&
+	create_commits_in workbench A B
+'
+
+test_expect_success "no report hook, push succeeds" '
+	test_when_finished "rm -rf upstream" &&
+	test_when_finished "git -C workbench remote remove origin" &&
+	git init --bare upstream &&
+
+	git -C workbench remote add origin ../upstream &&
+	git -C workbench push origin $A:refs/heads/main &&
+	git -C workbench push origin $B:refs/heads/main >out 2>&1 &&
+
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
+	To ../upstream
+	   <COMMIT-A>..<COMMIT-B>  <COMMIT-B> -> main
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success "passthrough does not alter report" '
+	test_when_finished "rm -rf upstream" &&
+	test_when_finished "git -C workbench remote remove origin" &&
+	git init --bare upstream &&
+
+	test_hook -C upstream --setup report <<-\EOF &&
+	cat
+	EOF
+
+	git -C workbench remote add origin ../upstream &&
+	git -C workbench push origin $A:refs/heads/main &&
+	git -C workbench push origin $B:refs/heads/main >out 2>&1 &&
+
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
+	To ../upstream
+	   <COMMIT-A>..<COMMIT-B>  <COMMIT-B> -> main
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success "non-zero exit causes receive-pack to die" '
+	test_when_finished "rm -rf upstream" &&
+	test_when_finished "git -C workbench remote remove origin" &&
+
+	git init --bare upstream &&
+	git -C workbench remote add origin ../upstream &&
+	git -C workbench push origin $A:refs/heads/main &&
+
+	test_hook -C upstream --setup report <<-\EOF &&
+	exit 1
+	EOF
+
+	test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin $B:refs/heads/main >out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
+	fatal: report hook failed
+	send-pack: unexpected disconnect while reading sideband packet
+	fatal: the remote end hung up unexpectedly
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success "hook is invoked and receives report on stdin" '
+	test_when_finished "rm -rf upstream" &&
+	test_when_finished "git -C workbench remote remove origin" &&
+
+	git init --bare upstream &&
+	test_hook -C upstream --setup report <<-EOF &&
+	tee raw
+	EOF
+
+	git -C workbench remote add origin ../upstream &&
+	git -C workbench push origin $A:refs/heads/main &&
+	git -C workbench push origin $B:refs/heads/main >out 2>&1 &&
+
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	To ../upstream
+	   <COMMIT-A>..<COMMIT-B>  <COMMIT-B> -> main
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+
+	test-tool pkt-line unpack <upstream/raw >actual-report &&
+	cat >expect-report <<-EOF &&
+	unpack ok
+	ok refs/heads/main
+	0000
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect-report actual-report
+'
+
+test_expect_success "hook can modify the report sent to client" '
+	test_when_finished "rm -rf upstream" &&
+	test_when_finished "git -C workbench remote remove origin" &&
+
+	git init --bare upstream &&
+	git -C workbench remote add origin ../upstream &&
+	git -C workbench push origin $A:refs/heads/main &&
+
+	test_hook -C upstream --setup report <<-\EOF &&
+	test-tool pkt-line unpack |
+	sed "s/^ok /ng /" |
+	test-tool pkt-line pack
+	EOF
+
+	test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin $B:refs/heads/main >out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
+	To ../upstream
+	 ! [remote rejected] <COMMIT-B> -> main (failed)
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success "hook can report a custom failure message" '
+	test_when_finished "rm -rf upstream" &&
+	test_when_finished "git -C workbench remote remove origin" &&
+
+	git init --bare upstream &&
+	git -C workbench remote add origin ../upstream &&
+	git -C workbench push origin $A:refs/heads/main &&
+
+	test_hook -C upstream --setup report <<-\EOF &&
+	echo "push rejected: service X is down" >&2
+	test-tool pkt-line unpack |
+	sed "s/^ok \(.*\)/ng \1 service-x-is-down/" |
+	test-tool pkt-line pack |
+	tee raw
+	EOF
+
+	test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin $B:refs/heads/main >out 2>&1 &&
+	test_grep "push rejected: service X is down" out &&
+
+	test-tool pkt-line unpack <upstream/raw >actual-report &&
+	cat >expect-report <<-\EOF &&
+	unpack ok
+	ng refs/heads/main service-x-is-down
+	0000
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect-report actual-report
+'
+
+test_expect_success "hook stderr with zero exit status code" '
+	test_when_finished "rm -rf upstream" &&
+	test_when_finished "git -C workbench remote remove origin" &&
+
+	git init --bare upstream &&
+	git -C workbench remote add origin ../upstream &&
+	git -C workbench push origin $A:refs/heads/main &&
+
+	test_hook -C upstream --setup report <<-\EOF &&
+	echo "push rejected: service X is down" >&2
+	tee raw
+	EOF
+
+	git -C workbench push origin $B:refs/heads/main >out 2>&1 &&
+	test_grep "push rejected: service X is down" out &&
+
+	test-tool pkt-line unpack <upstream/raw >actual-report &&
+	cat >expect-report <<-\EOF &&
+	unpack ok
+	ok refs/heads/main
+	0000
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect-report actual-report
+'
+
+test_expect_success "hook stderr is relayed to client via sideband" '
+	test_when_finished "rm -rf upstream" &&
+	test_when_finished "git -C workbench remote remove origin" &&
+
+	git init --bare upstream &&
+	git -C workbench remote add origin ../upstream &&
+	git -C workbench push origin $A:refs/heads/main &&
+
+	test_hook -C upstream --setup report <<-\EOF &&
+	echo "hook-stderr-message" >&2
+	exit 1
+	EOF
+
+	test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin $B:refs/heads/main >out 2>&1 &&
+	test_grep "remote: hook-stderr-message" out
+'
+
+test_done

---
base-commit: 11c6700f10234578d10523faf35656ca491425c9
change-id: 20260812-758-introduce-hook-5b3af9f1a7e8


Thanks
- Karthik


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-21 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-18  7:55 [PATCH] hook: introduce the report hook for git-receive-pack(1) Karthik Nayak
2026-08-18 20:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-19  7:03 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-08-19 12:11   ` Karthik Nayak
2026-08-19 14:47     ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-08-19  7:39 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-19 13:13   ` Karthik Nayak
2026-08-19 13:20     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-19 13:24       ` Karthik Nayak
2026-08-20  9:50 ` Phillip Wood
2026-08-20 15:43   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-21 12:51   ` Karthik Nayak
2026-08-21 13:34 ` Karthik Nayak [this message]
2026-08-21 13:49   ` [PATCH v2] " Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-21 16:08     ` Karthik Nayak
2026-08-21 16:55     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260821-758-introduce-hook-v2-1-e90e2f7ac2cf@gmail.com \
    --to=karthik.188@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox