From: Harald Nordgren <haraldnordgren@gmail.com>
To: ps@pks.im
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, sandals@crustytoothpaste.net
Subject: Re: What will come after Git 2.56?
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 20:35:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924183523.53201-1-haraldnordgren@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ap50kgyenpRrsqln@pks.im>
> Well, same as there's room after Git 2.9 we also still have room after
> Git 2.99. No reason we cannot have Git 2.100. :)
I agree completely, no need signal that 3.0 is coming until it comes. Once it's
out, not a soul will question what number the release just before had.
I have a list of breaking changes that I would like to introduce, I was hoping
they could be considered before 3.0 is out -- otherwise I fear I have to wait
another 10 years for 4.0, I would like to change the default values of these
config values:
# Autostash by default
checkout.autostash=true
rebase.autostash=true
# User friendlier branch sorting
branch.sort=-committerdate
tag.sort=-version:refname
# Better diffing
diff.algorithm=histogram
diff.colormoved=zebra
diff.compactionheuristic=true
# Compare branches on when push/upstream are different
status.comparebranches=@{upstream} @{push}
It seemed a bit presumptuous to submit these as a patch, but maybe I should to
open the formal discussion?
Harald
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-06 7:03 What will come after Git 2.56? Junio C Hamano
2026-09-06 18:14 ` brian m. carlson
2026-09-07 8:23 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-24 18:35 ` Harald Nordgren [this message]
2026-09-24 19:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-27 13:48 ` Changing default config values (was Re: What will come after Git 2.56?) Phillip Wood
2026-09-27 19:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-28 3:32 ` Jeff King
2026-09-25 1:20 ` What will come after Git 2.56? Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-09-25 16:42 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-07 9:30 ` Emily Shaffer
2026-09-08 15:46 ` rsbecker
2026-09-08 15:59 ` brian m. carlson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260924183523.53201-1-haraldnordgren@gmail.com \
--to=haraldnordgren@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox