Re: [PATCH] Documentation: propose community voting process

[Tuomas Ahola <taahol@utu.fi>]

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

> [...]
> I previously mentioned "topic count", but commits are far easier to
> count.  So instead of requiring two topics in released versions,
> perhaps requiring five commits would be easier to implement and
> explain.
> 

Quoting the summit notes:

} * Emily: Have we used a voting process for something like this before?
} 
} * Patrick: We need proposals and a vote. Who would be allowed to vote?
} 
} * Peff: Active developers with a track record; perhaps a threshold such
}   as 50 merged patches.
} 

So it seems that Peff's proposed threshold was substantially higher
than what has been put forth in this thread.  Any comments on that?

--Tuomas