From: Nakul V S <vsnakul@gmail.com>
To: phillip.wood123@gmail.com
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, ps@pks.im,
phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk, gitgitgadget@gmail.com,
vsnakul@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sequencer: refuse to revert shallow boundary commits by default
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2026 22:48:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261031171834.64081-1-vsnakul@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7179f371-a709-476f-8e94-807d7b62ce6e@gmail.com>
Hi Phillip,
Thanks for the review. I've sent a v2 that addresses it:
https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.2273.v2.git.1793455522168.gitgitgadget@gmail.com
> I wonder if it would be better to refuse to cherry-pick and rebase a
> shallow boundary commit as well.
Yes, I think so. v2 covers revert, cherry-pick and rebase, including
the "apply" backend of rebase.
> Do you know of a sensible use for reverting a shallow boundary or is
> the new option added out of caution in case someone wants it?
Honestly it was out of caution.I can't think of a real use for it. v2 keeps --allow-shallow-boundary for revert and cherry-pick only, and rebase always refuses. If you'd
rather not have an escape hatch at all, I'm happy to drop it.
> For such a rarely used option I don't think we need to add it to the
> synopsis
Fair enough, it's out of the synopsis now.
> It would be good to extract this into a helper function so that we
> don't have to copy the code to detect a shallow boundary each time we
> need to detect one.
Done. There is one helper now, so the error message lives in a single
place.
Thanks,
Nakul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-31 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 10:09 [PATCH] sequencer: refuse to revert shallow boundary commits by default Nakul V S via GitGitGadget
2026-10-21 15:20 ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-21 19:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-26 10:58 ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-31 17:22 ` Nakul V S
2026-10-31 17:29 ` Nakul V S
2026-10-31 17:18 ` Nakul V S [this message]
2026-10-31 14:05 ` [PATCH v2] sequencer: refuse to pick or revert shallow boundary commits Nakul V S via GitGitGadget
2026-11-01 2:30 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261031171834.64081-1-vsnakul@gmail.com \
--to=vsnakul@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox