Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>,
	Simon Richter <Simon.Richter@hogyros.de>,
	Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Olamide Caleb Bello <belkid98@gmail.com>,
	Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Subject: [PATCH v3] pack-objects: use size_t for streamed large blobs
Date: Sun,  1 Nov 2026 08:29:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261101072904.274912-1-gitter.spiros@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261031183748.273957-1-gitter.spiros@gmail.com>

In builtin/pack-objects.c, write_no_reuse_object() handles blobs
exceeding core.bigFileThreshold by writing them in a streaming path. It
takes the size from st->size (size_t) and assigns it to an "unsigned
long" variable, which is then written to the pack object header, and
write_large_blob_data() adds up the compressed length in an "unsigned
long" as well.

On platforms where "long" is 32 bits but size_t is 64 bits, like 64-bit
Windows, handling a blob of 4GiB or more truncates the size in the pack
header while the data decompresses to the full size, corrupting the
object. If the compressed data also exceeds 4GiB, the length
accumulation overflows "unsigned long", misaligning the offsets of all
subsequent objects in the index.

When running repack or gc on a loose large blob, the original loose copy
is pruned, leaving only the corrupted packed copy and resulting in data
loss. Truncating st->size to 16 bits, with a 100KiB loose blob reachable
from a commit and "git -c core.bigFileThreshold=1k repack -a -d", leaves
a corrupt packed object and no loose copy.

Switch the streamed path to use size_t for the object size, and off_t
for the length of the compressed data, which write_large_blob_data()
adds up while it writes the stream piece by piece, and for
write_no_reuse_object()'s return value, like write_reuse_object()
already does. Other truncations in pack-objects are not reachable
because core.bigFileThreshold is itself an "unsigned long".

Triggering this requires processing an object of 4GiB or more on a
platform where "long" is 32 bits but size_t is 64 bits, so no test is
added.

Helped-by: Simon Richter <Simon.Richter@hogyros.de>
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
---
Changes since v2: say that this is about platforms where "long" is
32 bits but size_t is 64 bits, as Junio asked.

 builtin/pack-objects.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin/pack-objects.c b/builtin/pack-objects.c
index ca3a891dfb..24203b5359 100644
--- a/builtin/pack-objects.c
+++ b/builtin/pack-objects.c
@@ -412,13 +412,13 @@ static unsigned long do_compress(void **pptr, unsigned long size)
 	return stream.total_out;
 }
 
-static unsigned long write_large_blob_data(struct odb_stream *st, struct hashfile *f,
-					   const struct object_id *oid)
+static off_t write_large_blob_data(struct odb_stream *st, struct hashfile *f,
+				   const struct object_id *oid)
 {
 	git_zstream stream;
 	unsigned char ibuf[1024 * 16];
 	unsigned char obuf[1024 * 16];
-	unsigned long olen = 0;
+	off_t olen = 0;
 	struct repo_config_values *cfg = repo_config_values(the_repository);
 
 	git_deflate_init(&stream, cfg->pack_compression_level);
@@ -513,10 +513,11 @@ static inline int oe_size_greater_than(struct packing_data *pack,
 }
 
 /* Return 0 if we will bust the pack-size limit */
-static unsigned long write_no_reuse_object(struct hashfile *f, struct object_entry *entry,
-					   unsigned long limit, int usable_delta)
+static off_t write_no_reuse_object(struct hashfile *f, struct object_entry *entry,
+				   unsigned long limit, int usable_delta)
 {
-	unsigned long size, datalen;
+	size_t size;
+	off_t datalen;
 	unsigned char header[MAX_PACK_OBJECT_HEADER],
 		      dheader[MAX_PACK_OBJECT_HEADER];
 	unsigned hdrlen;

Range-diff against v2:
1:  185b9da891 ! 1:  02e682725b pack-objects: use size_t for streamed large blobs
    @@ Commit message
         write_large_blob_data() adds up the compressed length in an "unsigned
         long" as well.
     
    -    On platforms where "long" is 32 bits, handling a blob of 4GiB or more
    -    truncates the size in the pack header while the data decompresses to the
    -    full size, corrupting the object. If the compressed data also exceeds
    -    4GiB, the length accumulation overflows "unsigned long", misaligning the
    -    offsets of all subsequent objects in the index.
    +    On platforms where "long" is 32 bits but size_t is 64 bits, like 64-bit
    +    Windows, handling a blob of 4GiB or more truncates the size in the pack
    +    header while the data decompresses to the full size, corrupting the
    +    object. If the compressed data also exceeds 4GiB, the length
    +    accumulation overflows "unsigned long", misaligning the offsets of all
    +    subsequent objects in the index.
     
         When running repack or gc on a loose large blob, the original loose copy
         is pruned, leaving only the corrupted packed copy and resulting in data
    @@ Commit message
         because core.bigFileThreshold is itself an "unsigned long".
     
         Triggering this requires processing an object of 4GiB or more on a
    -    platform where "long" is 32 bits, so no test is added.
    +    platform where "long" is 32 bits but size_t is 64 bits, so no test is
    +    added.
     
         Helped-by: Simon Richter <Simon.Richter@hogyros.de>
         Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>

base-commit: 50fe5cc63f9cd6e89b87a2c9ccf96a444f4cfdb7
-- 
2.53.0


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-01  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-31 18:04 [PATCH] pack-objects: use size_t for streamed large blobs Elia Pinto
2026-10-31 18:37 ` [PATCH v2] " Elia Pinto
2026-11-01  6:37   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-11-01  7:29   ` Elia Pinto [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261101072904.274912-1-gitter.spiros@gmail.com \
    --to=gitter.spiros@gmail.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=Simon.Richter@hogyros.de \
    --cc=belkid98@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox