From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Chris Lee" Subject: Re: git-svnimport failed and now git-repack hates me Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:33:45 -0800 Message-ID: <204011cb0701051133r1ede14a6gd5093a3e7fa88cb5@mail.gmail.com> References: <204011cb0701031552j8292d23v950f828279702d3@mail.gmail.com> <7v1wmbnw9x.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <204011cb0701040958k884b613i8a4639201ae6443b@mail.gmail.com> <7v1wmalez6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <204011cb0701050919w2001105asefe2fd99165dfa95@mail.gmail.com> <7vbqldfg56.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Git Mailing List" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 05 20:34:02 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H2up5-0003BA-FN for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 20:33:51 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422694AbXAETdr (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:33:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422693AbXAETdr (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:33:47 -0500 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.238]:35857 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422690AbXAETdq (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:33:46 -0500 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 68so1140335wri for ; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 11:33:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RpmtJPL2pd7aRXqeYjc7ueSRCEA/kB+AssU9UYcQEbMukrBsFLauDqDwaajwpTITZipOfaHX25Qw9J44tBJubOC4QG9Vxpq40X7tYn0CV4TCQ7eFBpB8IX6dNCuZ6a49660J/Dc1eH0fQMuAvjNUHqihKcOTZkCk3/S6T676kjw= Received: by 10.90.98.10 with SMTP id v10mr873461agb.1168025626337; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 11:33:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.81.19 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:33:45 -0800 (PST) To: "Junio C Hamano" In-Reply-To: <7vbqldfg56.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 1/5/07, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Using git-verify-pack from master does not fail. It actually does > > verify the pack (after a pretty decent wait.) I should have tried > > master first before sending out the first mail. :) > > Depends on which "master" -- I pushed out the "chuncked hashing" > fix on "master" as commit 8977c110 as part of the update last > night. Well, that would definitely explain it. :) I did a fresh 'git pull' on master last night before I ran the git-verify-pack, and that was around 11PM PST. > > Junio: Did you still want me to try those steps with that patch > > anyway, even though it works on master? > > It would give us a confirmation that the above actually fixes > the problem, if your 1.4.1 fails to verify that same new pack > you just generated, on which you saw that the "master" (assuming > you mean the one with the above patch) works correctly. > > If your "master" before 8977c110 already passes, then there is > something else going on, which would be worrysome. The 'master' I had definitely included 8977c110. I can try it out with the tip from before that commit, though, if you want. Also, 'git-prune' took about 30 minutes to run to completion. Oddly, git-prune didn't remove the older packs - does git-prune ignore packs? 'git-repack -a -d' did remove them.