From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fetch-pack: parameterize message containing 'ready' keyword
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:02:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <211122.86tug4z6ih.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211122123415.464783-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 22 2021, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> The protocol keyword 'ready' isn't meant for translation. Pass it as
> parameter instead of spell it in die() message (and potentially confuse
> translators).
>
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2 [1]:
> - Add missing closing single quote after the parameter (suggested by
> Eric)
> - Remove stray 'no' at the second message (suggested by Ævar)
>
> [1]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/20211118103424.6464-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com/T/#u
>
> fetch-pack.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fetch-pack.c b/fetch-pack.c
> index a9604f35a3..62d6313708 100644
> --- a/fetch-pack.c
> +++ b/fetch-pack.c
> @@ -1410,9 +1410,13 @@ static int process_ack(struct fetch_negotiator *negotiator,
> * otherwise.
> */
> if (*received_ready && reader->status != PACKET_READ_DELIM)
> - die(_("expected packfile to be sent after 'ready'"));
> + /* TRANSLATORS: The parameter will be 'ready', a protocol
> + * keyword */
> + die(_("expected packfile to be sent after '%s'"), "ready");
> if (!*received_ready && reader->status != PACKET_READ_FLUSH)
> - die(_("expected no other sections to be sent after no 'ready'"));
> + /* TRANSLATORS: The parameter will be 'ready', a protocol
> + * keyword */
> + die(_("expected no other sections to be sent after '%s'"), "ready");
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> base-commit: cd3e606211bb1cf8bc57f7d76bab98cc17a150bc
This looks good to me & ready to go. Thanks for sticking with this
across various nits/small isues for all 3x iterations.
The TRANSLATORS comments being added here don't use our usual style, but
I'd be happy just to leave this be & take it as-is without a re-roll,
don't know about Junio...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-22 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-22 12:34 [PATCH v3] fetch-pack: parameterize message containing 'ready' keyword Bagas Sanjaya
2021-11-22 13:02 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2021-11-22 17:35 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=211122.86tug4z6ih.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com \
--to=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).