git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mikael Magnusson" <mikachu@gmail.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:11:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <237967ef0808221311o2c4b1b38m7a6ab1664dff686@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080822174655.GP23334@one.firstfloor.org>

2008/8/22 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>:
>
> A common use case for git here is to just use it as a code
> downloader without actually changing anything in the main branch.
>
> Especially in Linux kernel land there seem to be quite a few tree
> which are frequently rebased, which means that the usual "git pull -u"
> usually leads to conflicts even when one hasn't changed anything
> at all and just wants the latest state of that tree.
>
> I found this initially quite frustrating ("$@#!-git cannot
> even download new trees"), until I managed to
> script the necessary magic incarnations after some
> documentation study (which are quite a handfull to type manually).
>
> But I presume that's a reasonable common usage. Would it
> make sense to have some standard git sub command that does that?
> ("get latest state of remote branch, doing what it takes to get it")
> Or is there already one that I missed?

I'm pretty sure "git pull --rebase" will handle this case. You can set up
a config variable (per branch if you want) to make it the default so you
can just "git pull" again.

-- 
Mikael Magnusson

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-08-22 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-22 17:46 nicer frontend to get rebased tree? Andi Kleen
2008-08-22 17:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-22 18:27   ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-22 19:36     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-22 20:11       ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-22 20:33         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-22 20:36         ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-08-22 20:46           ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-22 20:29       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-22 21:23       ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-23  7:10       ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-23  9:24         ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-08-23 16:36           ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-23 23:00             ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-08-23 15:55         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-23 16:45           ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-23 17:58             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-25  9:36               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-23 18:18             ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-08-23 18:56               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-23 20:08                 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-08-23 21:38                 ` Documentating branches (was: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?) Marius Vollmer
2008-08-23 22:17                   ` Miklos Vajna
2008-08-23 22:30                     ` Documenting branches Marius Vollmer
2008-08-23 22:18                   ` Documentating branches Marius Vollmer
2008-08-22 17:56 ` nicer frontend to get rebased tree? Avery Pennarun
2008-08-22 18:31   ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-22 19:03     ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-22 19:34     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-08-23  7:15       ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-23  8:52         ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-23  9:21         ` Jakub Narebski
2008-08-23 16:53           ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-23 21:04             ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-23 21:52               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-23 22:09                 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-23 22:13                 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-08-24  0:30                 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-23 22:49             ` Jakub Narebski
2008-08-23 23:01             ` Theodore Tso
2008-08-23 23:01             ` A proposed solution (Was: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?) Theodore Tso
2008-08-22 20:11 ` Mikael Magnusson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=237967ef0808221311o2c4b1b38m7a6ab1664dff686@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mikachu@gmail.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).