From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (smtp2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5916F341674 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 18:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.27.42.2 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767811507; cv=none; b=VBd0hKSJgcJ3JnF/xoj1izv4YZh1fJMcCDJZQCDqcjH1XCcuh+cdkElixPMfQ2wS+20LmhS+t92xFJYppSB5ZraNc92j0pEZ12tui/tYT1yxpjkiIn4cDj4IBMQbtezlYWnufDK5+S7yBFm2ucxs9KJcph27slewcMaci8cCmu4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767811507; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IgLro9I116IcffuPQaNGaKJI190UOk6/OdIK5oYBl+8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qRgiF5gvTkg8gGhECubYjSXbri78T5317YeCFjfsjI5FtfW/lKm+nJcufk712nuY4L+NEK4ZfBZnaYx4QhNLt5y0wzkQWhSZpvzc89zVVTQe4UqnzoZEJzpTTwQyLiIQgpgqE459eiPn8XiWVKljWWIfvS96q443PMmnN5+Wy+k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=free.fr; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=free.fr; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=free.fr header.i=@free.fr header.b=QI4Gt0bq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.27.42.2 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=free.fr Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=free.fr Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=free.fr header.i=@free.fr header.b="QI4Gt0bq" Received: from piment-oiseau.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:d1:f360:5e36:599a:5e38:8283]) (Authenticated sender: jn.avila@free.fr) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 027D02003DA; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 19:44:51 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1767811493; bh=IgLro9I116IcffuPQaNGaKJI190UOk6/OdIK5oYBl+8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QI4Gt0bqh7wcIv9OGGI6VTYZsng2qKDXlySqJSx55Ln70Cw6DY/qHknM6T4fLleyU h7RqlO0yNYaIQM3Ib8xAug9fLQdEsj/Y2rRlhhMcAgXcI9aNqhRCmOaU50RmETV78z PK4eiMw5ukAt+WncSLlWB6XmcK/v44J7tvgJ/WL4ERFwBBQpW0YVyaFwXbnPGZFBRB /89nOTqN2LVj3gNnjv8V+meliAdd9dLm0SsFy36sKucBGeH5GUycXc5rS0hefwY/pG YL77sH2tvcNWwXrMXcNLBcLU5jz2I2zR3qheDn6T+7sHP2EUltrp1pjPk0viv8PHtX TMZYy6i9AMh1A== From: =?UTF-8?B?SmVhbi1Ob8OrbA==?= AVILA To: git@vger.kernel.org, Michael Lyons Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: git-blame: convert blame to new doc format Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 19:44:51 +0100 Message-ID: <2395053.ElGaqSPkdT@piment-oiseau> In-Reply-To: <9123496.T7Z3S40VBb@debian-mbp> References: <20260105230220.519303-1-git@michael.lyo.nz> <7894506.EvYhyI6sBW@piment-oiseau> <9123496.T7Z3S40VBb@debian-mbp> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Tuesday, 6 January 2026 22:16:02 CET Michael Lyons wrote: > > Here, let's transition to the format: .. and so > > on. > > This is the continuation of my question on `,`: Do these also go > to backticks or keep the underscores? My impulse is backticks, but let me > know: `..` or _.._? > > The start/end change from rev/rev makes sense. Definitely backticks here, because this is a complex synopsis span. > > > > - marked with a '*'. In the porcelain modes, we print 'ignored' and > > > - 'unblamable' on a newline respectively. > > > + marked with a `*`. In the porcelain modes, we print _ignored_ and > > > + _unblamable_ on a newline respectively. > > > > If the words are printed "verbatim", then the format is backticked: > > `ignored` and `unblamable`. > > Another one where I had backticks originally and switched them. I'm not super- > familiar with the porcelain parts. > > > This diff is quite large. If there are no other reasons to split the patch > > according to some semantic reason, then please split file by file. > > Okay. Next try will just be blame-options for now. You can push two commits in this series. > > > That's very good for a first try. Now, I hope that you will be ok to review > > my patches :-) > > That's very kind. I'll probably need a couple more rounds before my changes > pass inspection, let alone be declared competent to review yours. :) > > For the purposes of re-submission, should I be doing something with scissors > on this thread, or make a new thread? Usually, the reworked series is pushed with v2 as reply to the first mail of the first submission, using for instance: git send-email '--in-reply-to=<20260105230220.519303-1-git@michael.lyo.nz>' v2-*.patch JN