From: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
To: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Cc: Zenobiusz Kunegunda <zenobiusz.kunegunda@interia.pl>,
"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: fatal: Could not get current working directory: Permission denied | affected 2.10,2.11,2.12, but not 1.9.5 |
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 22:07:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <250f6b35-03c3-1fa8-8b6b-dfdc42660d8c@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kbpPBN21mbN2F20ikr6dXrKEcY=msqymaG8TOujeQF0jw@mail.gmail.com>
Am 17.03.2017 um 20:45 schrieb Stefan Beller:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:34 PM, René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> wrote:
>> Am 15.03.2017 um 22:30 schrieb René Scharfe:
>>> Am 15.03.2017 um 10:44 schrieb Zenobiusz Kunegunda:
>>>> $ git bisect bad
>>>> 7333ed1788b4f2b162a35003044d77a716732a1f is the first bad commit
>>>> commit 7333ed1788b4f2b162a35003044d77a716732a1f
>>>> Author: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
>>>> Date: Mon Jul 28 20:26:40 2014 +0200
>>>>
>>>> setup: convert setup_git_directory_gently_1 et al. to strbuf
>>>
>>> That's what I half-suspected, and I think by now I got an idea. Here's
>>> a test program:
>>
>> And here's a patch for letting strbuf_getcwd() use the same getcwd(3)
>> extension that pwd(1) uses. It avoids the need to guess the path's
>> length and thus reduces the chance of stumbling over strange error
>> codes. I wonder if it helps in your case.
>>
>> René
>>
>> ---
>> strbuf.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/strbuf.c b/strbuf.c
>> index ace58e7367..4c02801edd 100644
>> --- a/strbuf.c
>> +++ b/strbuf.c
>> @@ -442,6 +442,14 @@ int strbuf_getcwd(struct strbuf *sb)
>> {
>> size_t oldalloc = sb->alloc;
>> size_t guessed_len = 128;
>> + char *cwd;
>> +
>> + cwd = getcwd(NULL, 0);
>
> from my local man pages:
>
> As an extension to the POSIX.1-2001 standard, Linux (libc4, libc5,
> glibc) getcwd()
> allocates the buffer dynamically using malloc(3) if buf is NULL. In
> this case, the
> allocated buffer has the length size unless size is zero, when buf
> is allocated as big
> as necessary. The caller should free(3) the returned buffer.
>
> This sounds specific to Linux (though I am reading Linux man pages,
> which claim this; Also it seems I might have misread it as it also states
> "The pathname is returned as the function result and via the
> argument buf, if present.").
I'm only interested in FreeBSD for now, as that's the platform Zenobiusz
reported the issue on and I haven't been able to reproduce it, so this
is still a bit exploratory, but hopefully getting closer. This
extension is used in the first version of pwd(1) in FreeBSD's repo,
comitted 1994-05-26, so it was supported there basically forever.
The oldest version I found that's using the extention is NetBSD's
pwd(1), which was committed 1993-03-21 and carries a SCCS timestamp of
1991-02-20. Visual Studio .NET 2003 supports it as well.
> Looking further:
>
> These functions are often used to save the location of the current
> working directory for the purpose of returning to it later. Opening the
> current directory (".") and calling fchdir(2) to return is
> usually a faster
> and more reliable alternative when sufficiently many file descriptors are
> available, especially on platforms other than Linux.
>
> Not sure if that opens another door here?
Reducing the use of absolute paths may be a good idea in general, but
that would probably require major changes. And Windows doesn't seem to
offer fchdir() at all; I don't know if it has an equivalent function
that could be used to build a replacement.
René
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-17 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-06 16:10 fatal: Could not get current working directory: Permission denied | affected 2.10,2.11,2.12, but not 1.9.5 | Zenobiusz Kunegunda
2017-03-08 17:36 ` René Scharfe
2017-03-09 11:01 ` Zenobiusz Kunegunda
2017-03-11 21:17 ` René Scharfe
2017-03-13 12:23 ` Zenobiusz Kunegunda
2017-03-13 17:31 ` René Scharfe
2017-03-14 15:25 ` Zenobiusz Kunegunda
2017-03-13 13:23 ` Zenobiusz Kunegunda
2017-03-13 21:31 ` René Scharfe
2017-03-14 7:44 ` Zenobiusz Kunegunda
2017-03-14 17:59 ` René Scharfe
2017-03-15 9:44 ` Zenobiusz Kunegunda
2017-03-15 21:30 ` René Scharfe
2017-03-17 19:34 ` René Scharfe
2017-03-17 19:45 ` Stefan Beller
2017-03-17 21:07 ` René Scharfe [this message]
2017-03-17 22:29 ` Jeff King
2017-03-17 22:50 ` René Scharfe
2017-03-21 13:29 ` Zenobiusz Kunegunda
2017-03-21 19:04 ` René Scharfe
2017-03-22 8:30 ` Zenobiusz Kunegunda
2017-03-21 10:08 ` Zenobiusz Kunegunda
2017-03-09 11:11 ` Zenobiusz Kunegunda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=250f6b35-03c3-1fa8-8b6b-dfdc42660d8c@web.de \
--to=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
--cc=zenobiusz.kunegunda@interia.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).