From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David Jeske" Subject: Re: An alternate model for preparing partial commits Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:22:23 -0000 Message-ID: <25838.9547271237$1214615417@news.gmane.org> References: <9af502e50806271555j3cd06ecau122b11217f612217@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Jakub Narebski" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Robert Anderson" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 28 03:10:10 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KCOx5-0002LP-O4 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 03:10:08 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753360AbYF1BJJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:09:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753034AbYF1BJI (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:09:08 -0400 Received: from w2.willowmail.com ([64.243.175.54]:33147 "HELO w2.willowmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752622AbYF1BJI (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:09:08 -0400 Received: (qmail 32069 invoked by uid 90); 28 Jun 2008 01:08:58 -0000 X-Mailer: Willow v0.02 Received: from 67.188.42.104 at Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:22:23 -0000 In-Reply-To: <9af502e50806271555j3cd06ecau122b11217f612217@mail.gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: -- Robert Anderson wrote: > Possibly a succinct way of moving this conversation forward is to say that: > > What is desired is a workflow where partial commits can be tested, > when it is desirable not to change history. Why don't we just make a model where history changes are handled safetly? Then we don't have to be afraid to publish DAGs we may want to change later.