From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
To: Lidong Yan <yldhome2d2@gmail.com>
Cc: 502024330056@smail.nju.edu.cn, git@vger.kernel.org,
gitster@pobox.com, toon@iotcl.com
Subject: [PATCH v5.1 4/4] bloom: optimize multiple pathspec items in revision
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 09:55:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2619038e-05f5-4af8-bb20-e4e01138f839@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250710084829.2171855-5-502024330056@smail.nju.edu.cn>
On 7/10/2025 4:48 AM, Lidong Yan wrote:
> @@ -710,23 +709,26 @@ static void prepare_to_use_bloom_filter(struct rev_info *revs)
> if (!revs->pruning.pathspec.nr)
> return;
>
> - revs->bloom_keyvecs_nr = 1;
> - CALLOC_ARRAY(revs->bloom_keyvecs, 1);
> - pi = &revs->pruning.pathspec.items[0];
> + revs->bloom_keyvecs_nr = revs->pruning.pathspec.nr;
> + CALLOC_ARRAY(revs->bloom_keyvecs, revs->bloom_keyvecs_nr);
> + for (int i = 0; i < revs->pruning.pathspec.nr; i++) {
> + pi = &revs->pruning.pathspec.items[i];
>
> - /* remove single trailing slash from path, if needed */
> - if (pi->len > 0 && pi->match[pi->len - 1] == '/') {
> - path_alloc = xmemdupz(pi->match, pi->len - 1);
> - path = path_alloc;
> - } else
> - path = pi->match;
> + /* remove single trailing slash from path, if needed */
> + if (pi->len > 0 && pi->match[pi->len - 1] == '/') {
> + path_alloc = xmemdupz(pi->match, pi->len - 1);
> + path = path_alloc;
> + } else
> + path = pi->match;
>
> - len = strlen(path);
> - if (!len)
> - goto fail;
> + len = strlen(path);
> + if (!len)
> + goto fail;
>
> - revs->bloom_keyvecs[0] =
> - bloom_keyvec_new(path, len, revs->bloom_filter_settings);
> + revs->bloom_keyvecs[i] =
> + bloom_keyvec_new(path, len, revs->bloom_filter_settings);
> + FREE_AND_NULL(path_alloc);
> + }
Focus on the change to this diff when the patch below is applied on
top of the 3.5/4 I sent earlier, resulting in this diff:
@@ -733,13 +732,14 @@ static void prepare_to_use_bloom_filter(struct rev_info *revs)
if (!revs->pruning.pathspec.nr)
return;
- revs->bloom_keyvecs_nr = 1;
- CALLOC_ARRAY(revs->bloom_keyvecs, 1);
-
- if (convert_pathspec_to_filter(&revs->pruning.pathspec.items[0],
- &revs->bloom_keyvecs[0],
- revs->bloom_filter_settings))
- goto fail;
+ revs->bloom_keyvecs_nr = revs->pruning.pathspec.nr;
+ CALLOC_ARRAY(revs->bloom_keyvecs, revs->bloom_keyvecs_nr);
+ for (int i = 0; i < revs->pruning.pathspec.nr; i++) {
+ if (convert_pathspec_to_filter(&revs->pruning.pathspec.items[i],
+ &revs->bloom_keyvecs[i],
+ revs->bloom_filter_settings))
+ goto fail;
+ }
if (trace2_is_enabled() && !bloom_filter_atexit_registered) {
atexit(trace2_bloom_filter_statistics_atexit);
Also, I've included the hyperfine performance output in the commit
message.
Thanks,
-Stolee
--- >8 ---
From fe255b1acfbe90fa8e4c335435ae18ee95e6243c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lidong Yan <502024330056@smail.nju.edu.cn>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 08:04:34 -0400
Subject: [PATCH v5.1 4/4] bloom: optimize multiple pathspec items in revision
traversal
To enable optimize multiple pathspec items in revision traversal,
return 0 if all pathspec item is literal in forbid_bloom_filters().
Add for loops to initialize and check each pathspec item's bloom_keyvec
when optimization is possible.
Add new test cases in t/t4216-log-bloom.sh to ensure
- consistent results between the optimization for multiple pathspec
items using bloom filter and the case without bloom filter
optimization.
- does not use bloom filter if any pathspec item is not literal.
With these optimizations, we get some improvements for multi-pathspec runs
of 'git log'. First, in the Git repository we see these modest results:
Benchmark 1: old
Time (mean ± σ): 73.1 ms ± 2.9 ms
Range (min … max): 69.9 ms … 84.5 ms 42 runs
Benchmark 2: new
Time (mean ± σ): 55.1 ms ± 2.9 ms
Range (min … max): 51.1 ms … 61.2 ms 52 runs
Summary
'new' ran
1.33 ± 0.09 times faster than 'old'
But in a larger repo, such as the LLVM project repo below, we get even
better results:
Benchmark 1: old
Time (mean ± σ): 1.974 s ± 0.006 s
Range (min … max): 1.960 s … 1.983 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: new
Time (mean ± σ): 262.9 ms ± 2.4 ms
Range (min … max): 257.7 ms … 266.2 ms 11 runs
Summary
'new' ran
7.51 ± 0.07 times faster than 'old'
Signed-off-by: Lidong Yan <502024330056@smail.nju.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
---
revision.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
t/t4216-log-bloom.sh | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
index 4c09b594c55..ca8c1dde8ca 100644
--- a/revision.c
+++ b/revision.c
@@ -675,12 +675,11 @@ static int forbid_bloom_filters(struct pathspec *spec)
{
if (spec->has_wildcard)
return 1;
- if (spec->nr > 1)
- return 1;
if (spec->magic & ~PATHSPEC_LITERAL)
return 1;
- if (spec->nr && (spec->items[0].magic & ~PATHSPEC_LITERAL))
- return 1;
+ for (size_t nr = 0; nr < spec->nr; nr++)
+ if (spec->items[nr].magic & ~PATHSPEC_LITERAL)
+ return 1;
return 0;
}
@@ -733,13 +732,14 @@ static void prepare_to_use_bloom_filter(struct rev_info *revs)
if (!revs->pruning.pathspec.nr)
return;
- revs->bloom_keyvecs_nr = 1;
- CALLOC_ARRAY(revs->bloom_keyvecs, 1);
-
- if (convert_pathspec_to_filter(&revs->pruning.pathspec.items[0],
- &revs->bloom_keyvecs[0],
- revs->bloom_filter_settings))
- goto fail;
+ revs->bloom_keyvecs_nr = revs->pruning.pathspec.nr;
+ CALLOC_ARRAY(revs->bloom_keyvecs, revs->bloom_keyvecs_nr);
+ for (int i = 0; i < revs->pruning.pathspec.nr; i++) {
+ if (convert_pathspec_to_filter(&revs->pruning.pathspec.items[i],
+ &revs->bloom_keyvecs[i],
+ revs->bloom_filter_settings))
+ goto fail;
+ }
if (trace2_is_enabled() && !bloom_filter_atexit_registered) {
atexit(trace2_bloom_filter_statistics_atexit);
diff --git a/t/t4216-log-bloom.sh b/t/t4216-log-bloom.sh
index 8910d53cac1..639868ac562 100755
--- a/t/t4216-log-bloom.sh
+++ b/t/t4216-log-bloom.sh
@@ -66,8 +66,9 @@ sane_unset GIT_TRACE2_CONFIG_PARAMS
setup () {
rm -f "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/trace.perf" &&
- git -c core.commitGraph=false log --pretty="format:%s" $1 >log_wo_bloom &&
- GIT_TRACE2_PERF="$TRASH_DIRECTORY/trace.perf" git -c core.commitGraph=true log --pretty="format:%s" $1 >log_w_bloom
+ eval git -c core.commitGraph=false log --pretty="format:%s" "$1" >log_wo_bloom &&
+ eval "GIT_TRACE2_PERF=\"$TRASH_DIRECTORY/trace.perf\"" \
+ git -c core.commitGraph=true log --pretty="format:%s" "$1" >log_w_bloom
}
test_bloom_filters_used () {
@@ -138,10 +139,6 @@ test_expect_success 'git log with --walk-reflogs does not use Bloom filters' '
test_bloom_filters_not_used "--walk-reflogs -- A"
'
-test_expect_success 'git log -- multiple path specs does not use Bloom filters' '
- test_bloom_filters_not_used "-- file4 A/file1"
-'
-
test_expect_success 'git log -- "." pathspec at root does not use Bloom filters' '
test_bloom_filters_not_used "-- ."
'
@@ -151,9 +148,17 @@ test_expect_success 'git log with wildcard that resolves to a single path uses B
test_bloom_filters_used "-- *renamed"
'
-test_expect_success 'git log with wildcard that resolves to a multiple paths does not uses Bloom filters' '
- test_bloom_filters_not_used "-- *" &&
- test_bloom_filters_not_used "-- file*"
+test_expect_success 'git log with multiple literal paths uses Bloom filter' '
+ test_bloom_filters_used "-- file4 A/file1" &&
+ test_bloom_filters_used "-- *" &&
+ test_bloom_filters_used "-- file*"
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git log with path contains a wildcard does not use Bloom filter' '
+ test_bloom_filters_not_used "-- file\*" &&
+ test_bloom_filters_not_used "-- A/\* file4" &&
+ test_bloom_filters_not_used "-- file4 A/\*" &&
+ test_bloom_filters_not_used "-- * A/\*"
'
test_expect_success 'setup - add commit-graph to the chain without Bloom filters' '
--
2.47.2.vfs.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-10 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-25 12:55 [PATCH 0/2] bloom: use bloom filter given multiple pathspec Lidong Yan
2025-06-25 12:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] bloom: replace struct bloom_key * with struct bloom_keyvec Lidong Yan
2025-06-25 17:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-26 3:44 ` Lidong Yan
2025-06-25 12:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] bloom: enable multiple pathspec bloom keys Lidong Yan
2025-06-27 13:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-27 14:24 ` Lidong Yan
2025-06-27 18:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-01 5:52 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-01 15:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-02 7:14 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-02 15:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-03 1:52 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-04 12:09 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-01 8:50 ` SZEDER Gábor
2025-07-01 11:40 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-01 15:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-27 20:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-28 2:54 ` Lidong Yan
2025-06-25 17:32 ` [PATCH 0/2] bloom: use bloom filter given multiple pathspec Junio C Hamano
2025-06-26 3:34 ` Lidong Yan
2025-06-26 14:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-27 6:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] bloom: enable bloom filter optimization for multiple pathspec elements in revision traversal Lidong Yan
2025-06-28 4:21 ` [PATCH v3 " Lidong Yan
2025-07-04 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Lidong Yan
2025-07-04 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] bloom: add test helper to return murmur3 hash Lidong Yan
2025-07-04 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] bloom: rename function operates on bloom_key Lidong Yan
2025-07-04 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] bloom: replace struct bloom_key * with struct bloom_keyvec Lidong Yan
2025-07-07 11:35 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-07-07 14:14 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-04 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] bloom: optimize multiple pathspec items in revision traversal Lidong Yan
2025-07-07 11:43 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-07-07 14:18 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-07 15:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-10 8:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] bloom: enable bloom filter optimization for multiple pathspec elements " Lidong Yan
2025-07-10 8:48 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] bloom: add test helper to return murmur3 hash Lidong Yan
2025-07-10 8:48 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] bloom: rename function operates on bloom_key Lidong Yan
2025-07-10 8:48 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] bloom: replace struct bloom_key * with struct bloom_keyvec Lidong Yan
2025-07-10 16:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-11 12:46 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-11 15:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-10 8:48 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] bloom: optimize multiple pathspec items in revision traversal Lidong Yan
2025-07-10 13:51 ` [PATCH v5.1 3.5/4] revision: make helper for pathspec to bloom key Derrick Stolee
2025-07-10 15:42 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-10 13:55 ` Derrick Stolee [this message]
2025-07-10 15:49 ` [PATCH v5.1 4/4] bloom: optimize multiple pathspec items in revision Lidong Yan
2025-07-10 13:49 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] bloom: enable bloom filter optimization for multiple pathspec elements in revision traversal Derrick Stolee
2025-07-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] " Lidong Yan
2025-07-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] bloom: add test helper to return murmur3 hash Lidong Yan
2025-07-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] bloom: rename function operates on bloom_key Lidong Yan
2025-07-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] bloom: replace struct bloom_key * with struct bloom_keyvec Lidong Yan
2025-07-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] revision: make helper for pathspec to bloom keyvec Lidong Yan
2025-07-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] To enable optimize multiple pathspec items in revision traversal, return 0 if all pathspec item is literal in forbid_bloom_filters(). Add for loops to initialize and check each pathspec item's bloom_keyvec when optimization is possible Lidong Yan
2025-07-12 9:47 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-12 9:51 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] bloom: optimize multiple pathspec items in revision Lidong Yan
2025-07-14 16:51 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-07-14 17:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-15 1:37 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-15 2:56 ` [RESEND][PATCH " Lidong Yan
2025-07-14 16:53 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] bloom: enable bloom filter optimization for multiple pathspec elements in revision traversal Derrick Stolee
2025-07-14 17:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-15 1:34 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-15 2:48 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-07-15 15:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-28 4:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] bloom: replace struct bloom_key * with struct bloom_keyvec Lidong Yan
2025-07-02 15:08 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-07-02 15:49 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-02 18:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-03 1:41 ` Lidong Yan
2025-06-28 4:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] bloom: optimize multiple pathspec items in revision traversal Lidong Yan
2025-06-27 6:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] bloom: replace struct bloom_key * with struct bloom_keyvec Lidong Yan
2025-06-27 6:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] bloom: optimize multiple pathspec items in revision traversal Lidong Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2619038e-05f5-4af8-bb20-e4e01138f839@gmail.com \
--to=stolee@gmail.com \
--cc=502024330056@smail.nju.edu.cn \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=toon@iotcl.com \
--cc=yldhome2d2@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).