From: Howard Miller <howard@e-learndesign.co.uk>
To: Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Commited to wrong branch
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:10:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26ae428a0909150510n56b1d4eg6565a6cca8c9b46c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46a038f90909150416h60ea7d74xd2337fe50f603dcb@mail.gmail.com>
Martin,
Looked at gitk - yes there is definitely one more commit still on the
current (wrong) branch.
I deleted the offending file and have now successfully switched to the
other (correct) branch.
Howard
2009/9/15 Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Howard Miller
> <howard@e-learndesign.co.uk> wrote:
>> I'm pretty shocked how difficult this is... still...
>
> No prob. It's only hard at the beginning :-)
>
>> I'm finding git logs and reflogs pretty difficult to read and
>> interpret (head melting) - in particular telling what happened on what
>> branch -
>
> I found gitk enormously helpful to visualise things. Try
>
> gitk # will show you the current branch
>
> gitk X Y # will show you both branches
>
> gitk is a ton easier to visualise. git log is pretty good but won't
> show merges, so it's limited.
>
> git reflog is confusing, but it's mostly a tool to help when there's
> been a mess and you want to diagnose WTH happened...
>
>>but looking at the reflog (which I assume is showing me the
>> actions on the current branch, but I'm not sure)
>
> Don't worry about the reflog...
>
>> I think I must have
>> made two commits on the wrong branch so the reset has only 'popped'
>> the top one. Other than that your interpretation is correct.
>
> Ok, so looking at gitk, there would still be one "wrong" commit. Can
> you confirm?
>
>> I cannot currently change branches - it only complains about one file.
>
> If you did follow my previous instructions (specially doing 'git reset
> --hard'), then this should not happen. Except...
>
> Except when you have a file that git is not tracking, and it exists in
> the "other" branch. The commit you undid earlier probably added that
> file. So just rm that file, and change branches.
>
>> I'm a bit worried about that - I would like to understand why this is
>> a problem but I don't.
>
> About the file? It was "new" in the commit you un-committed. So when
> you do git reset --hard, git makes sure all the files it is
> _currently_ tracking are "unchanged". If that file was new, it ignores
> it. Just rm it and be happy.
>
>> So I am now a little hazy on how to deal with previous TWO commits.
>
> Just review gitk and confirm if there are more commits to unstich --
> and we'll work from there
>
>
> m
> --
> martin.langhoff@gmail.com
> martin@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
> - ask interesting questions
> - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
> - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-15 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-15 10:31 Commited to wrong branch Howard Miller
2009-09-15 10:55 ` Martin Langhoff
2009-09-15 11:05 ` Howard Miller
2009-09-15 11:16 ` Martin Langhoff
2009-09-15 12:10 ` Howard Miller [this message]
2009-09-15 12:46 ` Martin Langhoff
2009-09-15 12:58 ` Howard Miller
2009-09-15 13:06 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-09-15 13:12 ` Howard Miller
2009-09-15 13:54 ` Martin Langhoff
2009-09-15 14:11 ` Howard Miller
2009-09-15 20:39 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-09-15 20:52 ` Howard Miller
2009-09-15 21:53 ` Martin Langhoff
2009-09-15 22:30 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-09-15 13:27 ` Howard Miller
2009-09-15 13:45 ` Howard Miller
2009-09-15 14:08 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-09-15 13:46 ` Martin Langhoff
2009-09-15 11:19 ` Björn Steinbrink
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26ae428a0909150510n56b1d4eg6565a6cca8c9b46c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=howard@e-learndesign.co.uk \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.langhoff@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).