git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: martinvz <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Difference between pull --rebase and fetch+rebase
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 04:58:04 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <27059574.post@talk.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27059158.post@talk.nabble.com>


Forgot to say that I am using version 1.6.5.1.1367.gcd48 (Cygwin). I should
also say that I can see no particular reason why exactly two extra commits
were picked.


martinvz wrote:
> 
> I have a branch configured to track a remote branch by rebasing. I
> excepted that "git pull" would therefore be equivalent to fetching from
> the remote repository followed by rebasing the remote branch, but it
> isn't. When doing "git rebase <remote>/<branch>", it applies only the
> commits after the merge base. When doing "git pull", it tries to apply two
> more commits (the two commits preceding the merge base). Why is this?
> 
> I get the same result even if I do "git pull --rebase <remote> <branch>",
> it doesn't seem to have anything to do with incorrect configuration of the
> branch.
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Difference-between-pull---rebase-and-fetch%2Brebase-tp27059158p27059574.html
Sent from the git mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-07 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-07 12:23 Difference between pull --rebase and fetch+rebase martinvz
2010-01-07 12:58 ` martinvz [this message]
2010-01-07 16:00 ` Santi Béjar
2010-01-07 18:44   ` martinvz
2010-01-07 22:33     ` Santi Béjar
2010-01-07 23:38       ` martinvz
2010-01-08 11:05         ` Santi Béjar
2010-01-08 19:41           ` martinvz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=27059574.post@talk.nabble.com \
    --to=martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).