From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rostislav Svoboda Subject: Re: Best way to merge two repos with same content, different history Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 19:19:51 +0200 Message-ID: <286817520906051019k78dc002cg8006987a7258b6de@mail.gmail.com> References: <63BEA5E623E09F4D92233FB12A9F794303117DBF@emailmn.mqsoftware.com> <286817520906050953n1afed29cn6c85f219a0c9b8b5@mail.gmail.com> <63BEA5E623E09F4D92233FB12A9F794303117DC1@emailmn.mqsoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Kelly F. Hickel" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 05 19:20:02 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MCd5F-0003lM-5M for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:20:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752790AbZFERTv convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:19:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751736AbZFERTu (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:19:50 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com ([209.85.218.213]:65362 "EHLO mail-bw0-f213.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751302AbZFERTu convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:19:50 -0400 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so1650308bwz.37 for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:19:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7VZvjKCH6iFMGnVVhTlDECNBvN89lQ4X1uWXTEmEw1o=; b=RbFv14tcOeRNoehCGuTol1kL5uFy/6x1RSRqLqGwVG7BbZAxDZbLfizCzcQyJ60VQH XZbciGmU5T2j/5ldalevmAhxIPjaZxExoZt5b/tCP2kdnXL0yon44DfAf6rXp5RE+3/K LtpmFnUlZ9H1RbwL4hyrSAIvpRFjyvey63i9E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wbNLZP3WHLohDCjyloXMSd7ouwQdSWe0L+tg+WlUJT1IrTW78WNB3k9bepToLs745O rytYm4GXlB4IsuojWZbN11sF//txp6tIvY3Vr5Y1gnnRo7eYKEMI8Q6C2dSdMKne9SD6 Tk/Ao314NdeqNQwY27DUIwI6i9WH18wOeXq8Y= Received: by 10.204.55.200 with SMTP id v8mr3403053bkg.54.1244222391261; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:19:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <63BEA5E623E09F4D92233FB12A9F794303117DC1@emailmn.mqsoftware.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 19:10, Kelly F. Hickel wrote= : > Bost, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Thanks, but I'm already working with a local copy of t= he CVS repo. =A0I've corresponded with Michael Haggerty about the time = this takes, and there just doesn't seem to be any way to improve the sp= eed, without making some fairly drastic changes to cvs2git. uhm, see below Bost On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 14:55, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> If you do not have filesystem access to your CVS repository, you mig= ht >> be able to clone it using CVSSuck [2,3]. > > A substantially faster option would be to go with cvsclone: > > http://samba.org/ftp/tridge/rtc/cvsclone.l > > (in my case, cvsclone was not only faster, but it actually worked, to= o, > which is more than I could say of CVSSuck).