From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Denholm Subject: Re: Pull is Mostly Evil Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 20:37:19 +1000 Message-ID: <2bbbfedd-b224-4ef0-a611-fe78d3446db8@email.android.com> References: <5363BB9F.40102@xiplink.com> <5364A143.1060404@bbn.com> <87iopnwa2i.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5364b11b4db8d_1996f531068@nysa.notmuch> <87eh0bw5gh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5365c45fd101d_6c25cd72ec2e@nysa.notmuch> <53660d8d74c68_1c89b0930c53@nysa.notmuch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Richard Hansen , Junio C Hamano , Marc Branchaud , Git Mailing List To: Felipe Contreras , David Lang , David Kastrup X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 04 12:37:41 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wgtnf-0005Z2-49 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 04 May 2014 12:37:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753399AbaEDKh3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 May 2014 06:37:29 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:48939 "EHLO mail-pd0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753140AbaEDKh3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 May 2014 06:37:29 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id fp1so1506459pdb.6 for ; Sun, 04 May 2014 03:37:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:from:date:to:cc :message-id; bh=7aTsCmwD6L6wzjDpt3IlaJ530Rl7dh1KKSxTzGZWeVk=; b=TJeqskeXLOAkX/obNgvw7buMatE7SA2o2WNh44ZbMChfwwF96plUmpRgojtaxZHy9A 8qlHmEPlqj/h+G5G66zVmW5SDVJguT6G0K23sEtxsyga+qZ1zvgDJdsektzL70gxVNmu WvB1e31zO4ssmxbhu8qPr7Smmm153p1Ek0rxp3a5B41zrykM08/Cw0PP4NuQpC0Rdwiy 1CbDC7Yxbfe9Qep8xr9gmlRYXaFJvNrI9HNkezN3smiVjIdyP2BKAeXKFW2POYZnySLy b5PvPAVTxGOvcGR6wb216vjrGPwkfFVIu/Dk9EaIBgr9t1YjR0LqRxgSSJGWcLCMNlUC C+Ew== X-Received: by 10.66.181.70 with SMTP id du6mr57739600pac.23.1399199848329; Sun, 04 May 2014 03:37:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.85.81.43] ([101.119.28.191]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yv7sm42206353pac.33.2014.05.04.03.37.24 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 04 May 2014 03:37:27 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Kaiten Mail In-Reply-To: <53660d8d74c68_1c89b0930c53@nysa.notmuch> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 4 May 2014 19:51:09 GMT+10:00, Felipe Contreras wrote: >James Denholm wrote: >> Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >David Lang wrote: >> >> the vast majority of people here do not take that attitude. >> > >> >It's actually the exact opposite. I don't care what is the track >record >> >of the people in the discussion. >> >> Ah, yes, like that discussion we once had where you totally didn't >run >> `git log | grep James Denholm` at one point to demonstrate that I had >> not yet made any contributions,instead of actually engaging in >> discussion. Oh, wait. > >You mean this thread[1] in which I sent 14 mails directly to you? Yeah, >I din't engage in that discussion at all! Yeah, you didn't. Instead you danced, but I guess it's really all said and done now so eh, have your point. >> >If their argument is good, their argument is good. >> >> The problem, though, is that time and time again you've shown that >you >> value your own arguments to the exclusion of all others. You can't >> tell if someone else's argument is good, because it runs against >> yours, and yours must be right because you hold it. > >I can show you evidence of how that's a blatant lie. Just two days ago >I >changed my mind because somebody provided a good argument. And I can show you evidence of you being indiscourseable on the topic of your pet proposals, but I won't, because you're indiscourseable on the meta similarly. >But I'm not going to bother any more with you, you are just spreading >lies and tainting the discussion. Well, maybe we'll see what other folks think. Regards, James Denholm.