git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
To: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for --wrt-author, --author and --exclude-author switches to git-rev-list
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:54:16 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2cfc403205060717543891334f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2cfc403205060702594da21fb1@mail.gmail.com>

| not sure why, but my first attempt to post this to the list didn't
seem to make it

| I've also modified my response slightly to suggest an alternate name for the
| --exclude-author swtich which may partly address pasky's concerns. amended
| response marked with ***

On 6/7/05, Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz> wrote:
>
> I'd prefer just --wrt-author and --exclude-author to take an argument on
> their own.

The reason I don't want to do this is that it doesn't really make
sense in the context of the change to specify one author for
--wrt-author and another for --exclude-author. In normal use --author
defaults to GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL or the locally derived user@host.domain.
The  intention is simply to override this default derivation.

*** That said, it might better if --exclude-author was called
something like --following-author --after-author or --stop-at-author,
since its meaning is to stop traversal rather than simply omit match
entries which is the meaning that a reasonable user might attach to
use of the word "exclude"

My preference is --following-author.

Thoughts anyone?

>
> (Note that I don't endorse this patch and the --wrt-author behaviour in
> particular seems strange. I don't have enough time to comment on it
> sensibly now, though. I'm just focusing on style here since I'd like to
> still be able to read git's source code few weeks from now on.)

The rationale for the change is as follows:

During parallel development, one is aware of ones own
changes...everyone else changes haven't happened yet as far as you are
concerned. Only when they appear in a future merge that incorporates
one's own changes do the other changes appear in your own workspace.

As far as you are concerned, these changes occurred after you made
your own - your changes were not dependent on those changes, only on
those that came before. So the linearisation reflects that perceived
ordering of changes.

--wrt-author helps to reconstruct the merge-history from the
perspective of each individual committer.

Let me know if this doesn't explain the rationale completely enough
for your understanding.

jon.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-06-08  0:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-07  9:15 [PATCH] Add support for --wrt-author, --author and --exclude-author switches to git-rev-list Jon Seymour
2005-06-07  9:30 ` Jon Seymour
2005-06-07  9:49 ` Petr Baudis
     [not found]   ` <2cfc403205060702594da21fb1@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <2cfc403205060702596dee7341@mail.gmail.com>
2005-06-07 15:58       ` Jon Seymour
2005-06-08  0:54     ` Jon Seymour [this message]
2005-06-08  8:58     ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-08  9:31       ` Jon Seymour
2005-06-08 10:52         ` Jon Seymour
2005-06-08 11:14         ` Jon Seymour
2005-06-08 16:36           ` [WITHDRAW PATCH] " Jon Seymour

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2cfc403205060717543891334f@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jon.seymour@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jon@blackcubes.dyndns.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).