From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Seymour Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add script for patch submission via e-mail. Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 19:39:10 +1000 Message-ID: <2cfc40320507050239605e8d3a@mail.gmail.com> References: <7vll5h7k5t.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20050705093441.GD6191@pasky.ji.cz> Reply-To: jon@blackcubes.dyndns.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Linus Torvalds , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 05 11:40:57 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dpjtx-0000LW-ME for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 11:39:37 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261784AbVGEJjU (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2005 05:39:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261786AbVGEJjU (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2005 05:39:20 -0400 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.204]:62241 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261784AbVGEJjM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2005 05:39:12 -0400 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so831794rne for ; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 02:39:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BxHRqogGPyOPhJTA0be512e8qlWBQkqWAprzNEvGuT0KToC8DhIID13DhzQVaOBbFIrgsAiAw8PsmTCdSWrpkX1uS0dTQBKwAoPH9gj57kX2GpZWpkbc5r9d72yPNMIu/sXyC6TZC+/GJm2ahoXtLI6N5/AyrthqO6QwyNlVMWo= Received: by 10.38.11.27 with SMTP id 27mr3447013rnk; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 02:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.104.42 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 02:39:10 -0700 (PDT) To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: <20050705093441.GD6191@pasky.ji.cz> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 7/5/05, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Any reason why this was not applied? It appears kind of cool. Well, I > will probably take it and extend cg-mkpatch with it so I don't need it > in Git, but I'm so altruistic and want to bring at least a bit of light > to the gloomy dark world of the poor core Git plumbing users. ;-) As one who inhabits that dark world, I second that! jon.