From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Seymour Subject: A question about the tree associated with a git notes commit Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:16:55 +1100 Message-ID: <2cfc40321002092216p5cbf432bs3766d40858f9bf3a@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Johan Herland , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 10 07:17:05 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nf5sm-0005tA-ND for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:17:05 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752772Ab0BJGQ5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:16:57 -0500 Received: from mail-pz0-f187.google.com ([209.85.222.187]:64102 "EHLO mail-pz0-f187.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751141Ab0BJGQ4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:16:56 -0500 Received: by pzk17 with SMTP id 17so916059pzk.4 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:16:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=72ar24UL1Dgq6ioj/isuuMlY1A2U9+Dla6Etz07VE+I=; b=Nrh4EZ/U474yHty4sM1VYmBFRbeydT7f225Cy0pMfq1X+tI1hrTM5uEbz2xTrvJxQk v6aHxR+U2SZpolFKJ0d0NmnKyDIo8A1Sxo1mJQupaZ4uBE30zz5iYYMyYf0CFHv3ZnKI XyxO/KJlL6r02B7t+Iu33M9v5B97MAcycAUEI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=fuu+LSEdr7gnzYRMzp//Zu0lvBNwl3ynTUl3zu32sr/USsH5Xl+RdbFXluVWN1vp0J SyUbXkT9tsRLtdIyH3KvAxhKUOujL8JQqzWfkxFYpXAT9Sy3NKEixM7JNbeREyFzuedn DKxZ6Csz00QlAziOFnEcV6LfaggpWYQXcWfHY= Received: by 10.115.2.20 with SMTP id e20mr3205124wai.50.1265782615711; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:16:55 -0800 (PST) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Is the tree associated with a notes commit limited to a single level, or is there some attempt to balance the tree as the number of annotated objects increases? If the tree is currently restricted to a single level, is this eventually going to be a problem as the number of annotated objects continues to grow? Apologies if this question is answered with trivial analysis of the code, I admittedly haven't done that. jon.