From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: (qmail 17322 invoked by uid 107); 21 Feb 2010 23:04:51 -0000 Received: from vger.kernel.org (HELO vger.kernel.org) (209.132.180.67) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:04:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753388Ab0BUXEb (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:04:31 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:42701 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753308Ab0BUXEa convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:04:30 -0500 Received: by pwj8 with SMTP id 8so2022785pwj.19 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:04:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=A/dv0EzSF+Mtfy6EfwYJHvfpPq55SAScRo5H09WIbPY=; b=VdU6ocQ/mIHODtfxI0Rr5gpf1nDSASb0QDQ7z/DMRBK1xGTdhAFcTQy6tJAIkVfetn JjVxJHhsyofT7p3G2CaR+nbZSdPxRTJWJLtJ/YRg6vVqSIzmpEKIAc0A92syOIscjevg wLRbMab5rP33ywc6C2jMqDu4hGNRr13reQ1mI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sW3XgNScoK6tZzMqviyDWWZ8Ks9luAGy9T7huYDHaLLgzBgcASygbzRvkfXb/515ch PNdlW6BVcccjpvF/+uxOOJ7s99qcMGehAv+Ca6BbgZwL4J3d/k2DLiEg8++/UCSIgPUW gwtDe3dtoKTdn5Q6COCMDeM6Id3pTkJgh0p6g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.5.34 with SMTP id 34mr8825354wae.108.1266793469728; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:04:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <32541b131002191905u59a90866he0a38dfc661d45d2@mail.gmail.com> References: <2cfc40321002171835j107d2cdcr5f7667d769bf391e@mail.gmail.com> <20100218051129.GD10970@coredump.intra.peff.net> <2cfc40321002181704i73eb87demd03faaddf9bb108@mail.gmail.com> <32541b131002181913t24989addr84b612787a2f8c48@mail.gmail.com> <2cfc40321002182329q7b8c5b90nbd77a4e0678cd9c8@mail.gmail.com> <32541b131002191220q5a0eae6dk304173418f818ff3@mail.gmail.com> <2cfc40321002191825i605e5045w6f52f9f044a5d369@mail.gmail.com> <32541b131002191905u59a90866he0a38dfc661d45d2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:04:29 +1100 Message-ID: <2cfc40321002211504o28069d16h4b9d1ef2230d03fe@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: RFD: best way to automatically rewrite a git DAG as a linear history? From: Jon Seymour To: Avery Pennarun Cc: Git Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Avery Pennarun wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Jon Seymour wrote: >> (A hammer is, of course, a reasonably good tool for making things flat >> although it does tend to break things along the way). > > Nice analogy.  Well, thanks for the clarification and best of luck in > your slightly crazy project :) > Thank you - FWIW, it is shaping up very well. In turns out that in cases where the original merge was resolved in favour of the conflict, the compensation can be squashed with the compensated commit - effectively bring the eventual resolution forward in time. This is so, so cool. jon.