From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sitaram Chamarty Subject: Re: what's the current wisdom on git over NFS/CIFS? Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:07:47 +0530 Message-ID: <2e24e5b90907022337k55b9c984rf3b5a985283e18e4@mail.gmail.com> References: <2e24e5b90907021752t10243468sc07be88cd88ac5c1@mail.gmail.com> <4A4DA1D6.40301@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Linus Torvalds , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 03 08:37:57 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MMcPE-0007bt-Nr for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:37:57 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751743AbZGCGhr convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:37:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751600AbZGCGhq (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:37:46 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f226.google.com ([209.85.217.226]:59919 "EHLO mail-gx0-f226.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751312AbZGCGhq convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:37:46 -0400 Received: by gxk26 with SMTP id 26so3434382gxk.13 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:37:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kZcUAvnnB+FLLg8l8jk5CxAI/UmeYxwwH/duAdd0rUo=; b=eZCLnuGnxdgC2eSK7yaJRFjz4iOosFK9NNE5hc1/9W8am47tAWE0FHSockXYCUyCEB f67a/YgxPghxPZbU51UzesS3wbCSF9oTsRhVYfPzxv/NAtmZkRMQLyyi4wEsvVW0h9el mA0ExrvfqyvULR3czer0lO/FiRTZp8rlC6iZk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QSKSQ2mK8ImEnS4UQOIq6CiqTJ4jhSo1SK1N+cyb+Yn/JEEAine37oDPv+fX4usLcE cAfrZPwSKVo/W2i9NsSTtRaSx2QKJFHMLAt+sM8UmICc2w47avdZuk5BeUN6ZtcgMXLH fSbxjmeDxqrwnVpitC8uSNz4IgE700v8EG4JM= Received: by 10.231.34.3 with SMTP id j3mr984411ibd.43.1246603069159; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:37:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A4DA1D6.40301@viscovery.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Johannes Sixt wr= ote: > Sitaram Chamarty schrieb: >> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Linus >> Torvalds wrote: [snipped all of Linus' email] >> Though I asked this following from a debate on IRC, it now looks as = if >> this will solve another of my problems too. [snipped my "Windows story" ;-)] > I don't exactly understand why your reply with this Windows story to = the > fsyncobjectfiles paragraph. But if you think that fsyncobjectfiles+ms= ysgit Not at all. Since I was adding Gitte to the CC, I kept _all_ of Linus' email quoted to provide him the full context. My Windows story pertains in general to the whole email, really. >> Sounds like we can just do it with traditional Windows fileshares, a= s >> long as we make sure no one does a "git gc" on the bare repo that is >> being shared. =A0That's a very small price to pay! > > It will work with the caveat you mention. I have such a setup myself. And _that_ is what I was hoping to hear! Thank you! I can use it and test it all I like, but hearing the guys who know say "it will work" makes a big difference.