git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sitaram Chamarty <sitaramc@gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Bettini <bettini@dsi.unifi.it>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pushing remote branches
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:34:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e24e5b90911150304i1472ed13k6c60611ef2e9ba19@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <hdoko1$s78$1@ger.gmane.org>

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Lorenzo Bettini <bettini@dsi.unifi.it> wrote:
> Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
>>
>> Hi Lorenzo,
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 5:07 AM, Lorenzo Bettini <bettini@dsi.unifi.it>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>                url = git://...
>>
>>> isn't this enough to be able to push the experiments branch?
>>
>> not normally.
>>
>> The "git://" protocol is a read-only protocol by default.   Since it is
>> completely unauthenticated, enabling push via git:// is not a good idea in
>> general.
>
> so probably I managed to push origin master anyway because gitorious asked
> me for my ssh passphrase?

As far as I know you could not have pushed anything when the url is
git:// (at least by default.  Push over git:// can be enabled but is
highly inadvisable and I have not seen anyone enable it nor any good
reason to)

> Thus, if I had
>
> [remote "origin"]
>            fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
>            url = git@...
> [branch "master"]
>            remote = origin
>            merge = refs/heads/master
> [branch "experiments"]
>            remote = origin
>            merge = refs/heads/experiments
>
> instead of
>
> [remote "origin"]
>            fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
>            url = git://...
> [branch "master"]
>            remote = origin
>            merge = refs/heads/master
> [branch "experiments"]
>            remote = origin
>            merge = refs/heads/experiments
>
> I would have been able to push also to branch experiments?   Without having
> to add
>
> [remote "experiments"]
>            url = git@...
>            fetch = +refs/heads/experiments:refs/remotes/experiments/experiments
>
> ?

(by the way: do you mean refs/remotes/origin/experiments in that last
line above?)

Anyway to answer your question, I do not see the refspec line as the issue
here, but the URL for the repo, which determines how you access it.

regards,

sitaram

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-15 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-14 23:37 pushing remote branches Lorenzo Bettini
2009-11-15  0:45 ` Sitaram Chamarty
2009-11-15 10:21   ` Lorenzo Bettini
2009-11-15 11:04     ` Sitaram Chamarty [this message]
2009-11-16 15:27       ` Lorenzo Bettini
2009-11-16 20:05         ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2e24e5b90911150304i1472ed13k6c60611ef2e9ba19@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sitaramc@gmail.com \
    --cc=bettini@dsi.unifi.it \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).