From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364091F4F8 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 13:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752512AbcJEN7Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2016 09:59:25 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:34308 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752164AbcJEN7Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2016 09:59:24 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id b201so19568751wmb.1 for ; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 06:59:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:newsgroups:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ptSFv8JQDSJXR01baksDqdLSCml+czXqEOdS3YeJIJE=; b=gCP3TDW3PyAu1HeEUjKytiS8QQ0GOqQLmyRk5Ha768kWefoLRU7dx5raxvgKPH91jH M/3hoCuV5tOV3dQfE/4c2eaHPkr/Ya0f81HmYGCGwx+eyVGOIFkchlHZkut4uPXiGNgK Uah/qMJbtJS1gWO9dbLDld3h3ptgz/a20vgy+GKvlLl4bYh9naOHTcSKQhtsw03TGiIz tnvszl/JZbuzyvNRNKuCo0nFtKbatBv48HFuAcDsRtP4u/81e1xomJDJGfDulqDctO9B Lc0HFZaj8SYviFMed3HOlpGrp+Rwjl38sH/GZdbl3cXCzVxIalHkgwBPRj60TA6sk3s/ lAbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:newsgroups:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ptSFv8JQDSJXR01baksDqdLSCml+czXqEOdS3YeJIJE=; b=moaD2EOuSx35bRdAx+l05urmOkywoOwp8P7EUXeCCvbPnfUDnPhJHuNJa29Gn9AY+4 bZdys11s8GMg4jcMZJFu7nEWPorcdg1ciPs7uDjoOxjGsWgO8yN/207cK+dlqpysyzXo ZTnii5pxKhXOAhPpyKbziMWDYr3hmaw2U7onkJ1ToZgaCt6AGzNmsjVeIC5IEX8azzTH 0XxIefLUqTxsk5AcfE1dZpLPvmK5uQNo74ghZBRS8WhjDR22ral9C2Bcvs4yBYZu5/J0 WSY8ezEEO3CtLrLwb4FUgoeSa9+hDD7pDteXWN5SIn8xgE/JJfwPCyUyDiBUkIyvi86b TVFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkieKrgNp2WWQAFSMkYx7OBg/iSKSzG3TF6mQHvNM1Ncr2OJw5Ec3nbj9wd1PqiJw== X-Received: by 10.194.250.106 with SMTP id zb10mr7471711wjc.99.1475675949425; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 06:59:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.26] (acte13.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl. [83.11.58.13]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ce6sm9152146wjc.27.2016.10.05.06.59.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Oct 2016 06:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/18] t5613: clarify "too deep" recursion tests To: Stefan Beller , Jeff King References: <20161003203321.rj5jepviwo57uhqw@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20161003203412.bekizvlqtg4ls5fb@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20161004134853.x3zq33ywyyzgbwsy@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20161004204933.ygfhoy24g6psyf6h@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20161004205510.6bhisw7ixbgcvvwn@sigill.intra.peff.net> Cc: Jacob Keller , Git mailing list , =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=c3=a9_Scharfe?= Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.git From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jakub_Nar=c4=99bski?= Message-ID: <2ea2f077-ab02-2631-4ce9-93cdd22c3c6b@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 15:58:53 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org W dniu 04.10.2016 o 22:58, Stefan Beller pisze: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Jeff King wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:52:19PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: >> >>>>>>>> +# Note: These tests depend on the hard-coded value of 5 as "too deep". We start >>>>>>>> +# the depth at 0 and count links, not repositories, so in a chain like: >>>>>>>> +# >>>>>>>> +# A -> B -> C -> D -> E -> F -> G -> H >>>>>>>> +# 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 >>>>>>>> +# > > Input from a self-claimed design expert for ASCII art. ;) > What about this? > > # A -0-> B -1-> C -2-> ... I would prefer the following: # A --> B --> C --> D --> E --> F --> G --> H # 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 that is, the number below the middle of the arrow (which could have been even longer) # A ---> B ---> C ---> D ---> E ---> F ---> G ---> H # 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Let's paint this bikeshed _plaid_ ;-)))) -- Jakub Narębski