From: Baz <brian.ewins@gmail.com>
To: kusmabite@gmail.com
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: possible usability issue in rebase -i?
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:05:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2faad3050910271405k4a391184vb978b9b35484383b@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40aa078e0910270850u6ffec41cj372da11d9df533f@mail.gmail.com>
2009/10/27 Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@googlemail.com>:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Baz <brian.ewins@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've got a somewhat related minor usability issue with rebase -i. I
>> accidentally typed something like 'git rebase -i -z' and got this
>> message:
>>
>> error: unknown switch `z'
>> usage: git-rebase [-i] [options] [--] <upstream> [<branch>]
>> or: git-rebase [-i] (--continue | --abort | --skip)
>>
>> Available options are
>> -v, --verbose display a diffstat of what changed upstream
>> --onto ... rebase onto given branch instead of upstream
>> -p, --preserve-merges
>> try to recreate merges instead of ignoring them
>> -s, --strategy ... use the given merge strategy
>> -m, --merge always used (no-op)
>> -i, --interactive always used (no-op)
>>
>> The last two lines were the surprise. It suggested to me that '-i' and
>> '-m' were now the defaults for git-rebase - which of course they're
>> not. A user would not know that this is actually reporting the flags
>> that work for git-rebase--interactive, especially since that's not
>> what the command calls itself. I wasn't sure about the best approach
>> to fixing this - the only comparable commands that pass arbitrary
>> flags down to an exec'd program make it clear what program is going to
>> be called (usually git merge) and so interpreting errors is easier.
>>
>> It seems the intent here was to signal that the flags are different
>> once a rebase is in progress, but this usage message is shown when
>> rebase -i -z is called in any state.
>
> If that is the case, my instinct tells me that this information should
> be reflected in the usage-string (instead of the parameter
> description). Something like this?
I'm fine with this way of fixing it, but I'd make a few more changes...
>
> --->8---
>
> diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> index 23ded48..3ed5f94 100755
> --- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> +++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> @@ -13,15 +13,15 @@
> OPTIONS_KEEPDASHDASH=
> OPTIONS_SPEC="\
> git-rebase [-i] [options] [--] <upstream> [<branch>]
Use the dashless form and be more consistent with the help - and
mention '--root' here, it appears in the
help below:
-git-rebase [-i] [options] [--] <upstream> [<branch>]
+git rebase [--interactive | -i] [options] [--onto <newbase>] [--]
<upstream> [<branch>]
+git rebase [--interactive | -i] [options] --onto <newbase> --root
[--] [<branch>]
> -git-rebase [-i] (--continue | --abort | --skip)
> +git-rebase [-i] [-m] (--continue | --abort | --skip)
Again, dashless. And I'd not mention the useless -i here, the man page
doesn't either:
-git-rebase [-i] (--continue | --abort | --skip)
+git rebase (--continue | --abort | --skip)
> --
> Available options are
> v,verbose display a diffstat of what changed upstream
> onto= rebase onto given branch instead of upstream
> p,preserve-merges try to recreate merges instead of ignoring them
> s,strategy= use the given merge strategy
> -m,merge always used (no-op)
> -i,interactive always used (no-op)
> +m,merge use merging strategies
> +i,interactive interactively edit commits
These two items are misplaced in the help (I think). They're not like
abort, continue, skip, but then, the man page doesn't group those
separately either.
+no-verify override pre-rebase hook from stopping the operation
+root rebase all reachable commmits up to the root(s)
> Actions:
> continue continue rebasing process
> abort abort rebasing process and restore original branch
As above, remove the next two lines after your patch:
-no-verify override pre-rebase hook from stopping the operation
-root rebase all reachable commmits up to the root(s)
-Baz
>
> --
> Erik "kusma" Faye-Lund
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-27 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-27 10:13 possible usability issue in rebase -i? Erik Faye-Lund
2009-10-27 12:39 ` [PATCH] rebase -i: more graceful handling of invalid commands Jan Krüger
2009-10-27 14:17 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-10-27 14:21 ` Thomas Rast
2009-10-27 14:58 ` [PATCH v2] " Jan Krüger
2009-10-28 7:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-27 15:17 ` possible usability issue in rebase -i? Baz
2009-10-27 15:50 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2009-10-27 21:05 ` Baz [this message]
2009-10-28 12:20 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2009-10-28 14:34 ` Baz
2009-10-28 14:41 ` Erik Faye-Lund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2faad3050910271405k4a391184vb978b9b35484383b@mail.gmail.com \
--to=brian.ewins@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kusmabite@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).