From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Mark Levedahl" Subject: Re: Using email between 2 developers to keep git repositories in sync Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:35:12 -0500 Message-ID: <30e4a070801220635q4978fd2fvc469ca00af4e11cc@mail.gmail.com> References: <7A02F7D1-9EB0-43AB-96F9-DDD71D4EF5FE@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Johannes Schindelin" , ab_lists@mac.com, git@vger.kernel.org To: "Jakub Narebski" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 22 15:36:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JHKED-00028m-Nn for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:35:54 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752237AbYAVOfS (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:35:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751754AbYAVOfS (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:35:18 -0500 Received: from hs-out-0708.google.com ([64.233.178.241]:11159 "EHLO hs-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752051AbYAVOfQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:35:16 -0500 Received: by hs-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 54so2146549hsz.5 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:35:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=0S9ISs5t2uhSVosQKtqsakU6rCNh2bBfylD+BSslMAs=; b=VI0/SoagbZoQypyKMKGIqSwMTmGxBOoA/tjEGSvTl5v9ECsaIgf9l4CBEMSov037wmx/+qJ3PwNyJ6nZb6mxocB6/uzzOyqmcC9xy1KuyrsNIhlFM0vswFvew3yXx6JyFbwwpAO97ZYAhkPQcCku+O8YQo09i7sz4yUHzrT1C40= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=InyTpWIkpt+of9hWWR3/tn0xxpIVYhn5wi3qjm7uMVRxVW/rzYyHe+w0vQKbkEym2FzqP/CTCZgaagBx8USw7dyum9kni4h22Ex1ttDr/XSskYmyyKUlYFb5rxcgv4mGJJwp1Q3gYWkQexV09DIx9P5HnzXIKByaNfZtx4RxkWk= Received: by 10.142.79.15 with SMTP id c15mr4043137wfb.105.1201012512348; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:35:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.143.15.6 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:35:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Jan 22, 2008 8:53 AM, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > Besides, after initial setup IMHO it is much better to exchange > patches for review. Although usually there are more than two > developers in such case... > Bundles allow you to maintain identical history on two or more disconnected servers, and this is a very distinct advantage over patches. Absent use of bundles to distribute the integrated changes, the development history seen by both parties will diverge. Mark