Re: [PATCH] doc: add more AsciiDoc cross-references

["Julia Evans" <julia@jvns.ca>]

> To see if I understand correctly, let me rephrase the second
> paragraph a bit (not as an attempt to offer an improvement; by
> restating the above differently while expressing what I take to be
> the same thing, we will see whether I misunderstood what you wrote
> if my version ends up saying what you did not intend), as I found it
> somewhat puzzling.
>
>     The short form <<EXAMPLES>> uses EXAMPLES as both the link
>     target (which is not shown to the end user except in the
>     browser's location bar when the link is visited) and the
>     clickable text.  In different parts of the document, however,
>     the text in HTML may need to be rendered as "EXAMPLES" or
>     [EXAMPLES], which can be achieved by using the
>     <<EXAMPLES,"EXAMPLES">> or <<EXAMPLES,[EXAMPLES]>> form.  For
>     consistency, always use the longer form, even when there are no
>     such typesetting constraints.

I meant something different, let me try again (with Peff's corrections as well):

    The reason for using the more verbose <<EXAMPLES,EXAMPLES>>
    (instead of <<EXAMPLES>>) is that in some cases, <<EXAMPLES>> is
    rendered as `the section called "EXAMPLES"` or `[EXAMPLES]`.
    <<EXAMPLES,EXAMPLES>> is rendered as just `EXAMPLES`, which gives us
    more control over the output.

("in some cases" is code for "I still don't fully understand
exactly when each one happens and why")

> I'll mark the topic as Expecting a reroll in my working copy of the
> "What's cooking" report of the next issue.
>
> Thanks.