From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: layer Subject: git diff after merge (with conflict) Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:27:43 -0700 Message-ID: <324.1239298063@relay.known.net> To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 09 19:29:22 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lry40-0001xU-OS for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:29:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757591AbZDIR1o (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:27:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757295AbZDIR1o (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:27:44 -0400 Received: from relay.known.net ([67.121.255.169]:36189 "HELO relay.known.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1757210AbZDIR1o (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:27:44 -0400 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by relay.known.net (Allegro Maild v1.2.17) id 000000034483; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:27:43 -0700 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Is there some way to get regular unified diff behavior instead of the combined diff? For certain files (like ChangeLog's) the combined diff format after a merge is *very* confusing. Thanks. Kevin