git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Avery Pennarun" <apenwarr@gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Sixt" <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git-submodule getting submodules from the parent repository
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:24:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <32541b130803311424h339a30e6g4328ea27045c681d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47F08343.20209@viscovery.net>

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> wrote:
> Avery Pennarun schrieb:
> > It's a  pain to check out / mirror / check in / push.  git-submodule
>  > doesn't even init automatically when you check out A, so you have to
>  > run it yourself.  The relative paths of A, B, and C on your mirror
>  > have to be the same as upstream.  You can't make a local mirror of A
>  > without mirroring B and C.  B and C start out with a disconnected
>  > HEAD, so if you check in, it goes nowhere, and then when you push,
>  > nothing happens, and if you're unlucky enough to pull someone else's
>  > update to A and then "git-submodule update", it forgets your changes
>  > entirely.  When you check in to C, you then have to check in to B, and
>  > then to A, all by hand; and when you git-pull, you'd better to C, then
>  > B, then A, or risk having A try to check out a revision from B that
>  > you haven't pulled, etc.
>
>  Would a "recurse" sub-command help your workflow?
>
>  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/69834

Well, typing "git submodule recurse push" or something would allow me
to lose the same data without typing quite as much, so strictly
speaking I guess it would be an improvement :)

I'd like it even more if "git push" actually somehow refused to push
at all if I forgot to push in the submodules.

Have fun,

Avery

      reply	other threads:[~2008-03-31 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-29 22:35 git-submodule getting submodules from the parent repository Avery Pennarun
2008-03-29 23:22 ` Sam Vilain
2008-03-30 13:32   ` Eyvind Bernhardsen
2008-03-30 17:48     ` Sam Vilain
2008-03-30 19:50       ` Eyvind Bernhardsen
2008-03-30 20:19         ` Sam Vilain
2008-03-31 10:05           ` Eyvind Bernhardsen
2008-03-30 23:03         ` Avery Pennarun
2008-03-31  9:29           ` Eyvind Bernhardsen
2008-03-31 21:36             ` Avery Pennarun
2008-04-01 23:05               ` Sam Vilain
2008-04-01 23:56                 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-04-02  0:35                   ` Junio C Hamano
2008-04-02  2:03                     ` Avery Pennarun
2008-04-02 20:06                       ` Sam Vilain
2008-04-02 21:32         ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-30 23:00   ` Avery Pennarun
2008-04-01 23:10     ` Sam Vilain
2008-03-31  6:22 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-03-31 21:24   ` Avery Pennarun [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=32541b130803311424h339a30e6g4328ea27045c681d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=apenwarr@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).