From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Avery Pennarun" Subject: Re: Friendly refspecs (Was: Re: git annoyances) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:32:09 -0400 Message-ID: <32541b130804091332g539037d9x7f135a27ec25b888@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080409101428.GA2637@elte.hu> <20080409145758.GB20874@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20080409200836.GA19248@mithlond> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "git list" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 09 22:33:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JjgzG-000113-AH for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:33:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753735AbYDIUcN (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:32:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753271AbYDIUcM (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:32:12 -0400 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.191]:63760 "EHLO fk-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753687AbYDIUcM (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:32:12 -0400 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 19so3498822fkr.5 for ; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:32:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=wKC5IA8fQQDu3rLuz68ZLMlXfh4WmcNZMHEk5f1mptw=; b=g3jAYv0m3Ey3AoCBeTa84q1XCRwkqtUy+inc+subF4dYoc49kYPzdbV65ZKlHDcvVhTd6PnR9UZNUbHQu8RfPuEFEbZDyXmSWMO9GETGx3FqhnR5pnxkALynwK9ACakWfqw+P6NYgqsLIDVN+p0wwQ19DRHHuc18Dx17UiMpgck= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=koNOfEGiHsKRZSQS3pclcHSRYQlUCTf6mIbAZgMRyHGPRcSVFMoUZzJn0pe5KigtPwtac4lNjBybw680HuGm++ddldtcPIdKdfkgNFM1JZXeslrLS2aIoLps5AZ8fgtRw3LAyhP9kk2DSQtPdPCNXCy89jI5mhNJCsGj3XRFbaM= Received: by 10.82.105.1 with SMTP id d1mr868402buc.88.1207773129713; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.100.5 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:32:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080409200836.GA19248@mithlond> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Teemu Likonen wrote: > So would it be any good if "git fetch " without refpecs would use > +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes//* ? In any case the current behaviour > seems quite unfriendly. But what should be if you didn't provide it by doing git-remote-add? I think the lack of an obvious name for them is exactly why the branch names don't get created automatically. Avery