From: "Avery Pennarun" <apenwarr@gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Sixt" <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Cc: "Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: git-gc doesn't clean up leftover objects after git-filter-branch unless you clone first
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:41:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32541b130804230841h32c07f3arc94cccfaf0b156a3@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
On 4/23/08, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> wrote:
> Peter Karlsson schrieb:
> > [Not seeing any unreachable objects]
>
> > Jeff King:
> >> Did you remove refs/original/ ?
> >
> > That, and cloned the repository to a new location after the conversion,
> > and removing the references to "origin" there. It does seem that the
> > objects are still there, but I can't see them with "gitk --all".
>
> Did you clone locally? Then you must use the file:// protocol, otherwise
> everything is hard-linked from the origin.
This question has come up at least once a week since I subscribed to
the list. I can think of these solutions:
- Add a note to the git-gc and/or git-repack man page about how hidden
refs can impact the cleanup.
- Add an option to make git-clone *not* hardlink stuff; its different
behaviour for hardlinking vs. file:// seems to be very confusing.
- Make git-gc give a warning when there are some objects that are only
referenced via the reflog or refs/original. (I suspect this would
trigger too often though.)
- Give git-gc a "really, I'm serious" option that makes it ignore the
reflog and refs/original.
Thoughts?
Avery
next reply other threads:[~2008-04-23 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-23 15:41 Avery Pennarun [this message]
2008-04-23 17:00 ` git-gc doesn't clean up leftover objects after git-filter-branch unless you clone first Junio C Hamano
2008-04-23 18:36 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-04-23 22:13 ` Jeff King
2008-04-24 1:28 ` Jeff King
2008-04-24 15:43 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-04-24 16:14 ` Jeff King
2008-04-24 16:59 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-04-29 20:45 ` [PATCH] Documentation: point git-prune users to git-gc Jeff King
2008-04-29 22:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-04-29 23:19 ` Jeff King
2008-04-30 1:01 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32541b130804230841h32c07f3arc94cccfaf0b156a3@mail.gmail.com \
--to=apenwarr@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).